LOVO AI vs. Play.ht

The best way to compare LOVO AI vs. Play.ht: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

Get Started for Free →

Live Demo

Try our text-to-speech API. Click a button to generate random text:

Non-Fiction

Fiction

News

Blog

Conversation

0/250

Speed

0 s

Filesize

0 kb

LOVO AI

Hyper realistic AI voice generator that captivate your audience.

Play.ht

Transform written content into high-quality, lifelike voiceovers with AI-powered text-to-speech technology.

Voice Quality

Mean Opinion Score

Fiction

N/A

Non-Fiction

N/A

Conversation

N/A

Mean Opinion Score

Fiction

4.17

Non-Fiction

4.17

Conversation

3.48

Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.

Features

Voice Cloning

Multi-lingual

Per-word Timestamps

Pitch Control

Speed Control

Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Voice Cloning

Multi-lingual

Per-word Timestamps

Pitch Control

Speed Control

Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Both LOVO AI and Play.ht offer a range of features tailored for creating high-quality, AI-generated voiceovers, including voice cloning and multi-lingual support.
However, Play.ht distinguishes itself with additional functionalities such as per-word timestamps and support for phone formats, which may offer more versatility for users with specific technical requirements.
Despite LOVO AI's lack of certain advanced features, its simplicity and the inclusion of speed control could still make it a suitable choice for users prioritizing ease of use and basic customization options.

Pricing & Plans

Free

$0/mo

5 minutes (~3K chars)

Basic

$29/mo

2 hours (~80K chars)

Pro

$48/mo

5 hours (~200K chars)

Pro +

$149/mo

20 hours (~800K chars)

Free

$0/mo

12,500 characters

Creator

$39/mo

250,000 characters

Unlimited

$99/mo

2.5M characters limit

In a comparison of text-to-speech services based on pricing, Play.ht emerges as the more cost-effective option across all plans.
It offers a greater number of characters for free and maintains a better value proposition for both moderate and high-volume users with its paid plans.
Overall, for users prioritizing budget while seeking quality text-to-speech services, Play.ht provides superior affordability.

Customer Reviews

3.4 out of 5

Average of 200 ratings from leading review sites.

Customers appreciate LOVO AI for its realistic and diverse AI voices, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness. Many find it a valuable tool for creating voiceovers and content across various languages. However, some users report issues with robotic-sounding voices in certain languages, limited emotional range, and occasional technical glitches. The customer support and interface improvements are also areas highlighted for enhancement. Despite these issues, many users see LOVO as a beneficial tool for efficient and flexible voice generation.

Voice realism

Ease of use

Cost-effectiveness

Language diversity

Emotional range

Customer support

Technical stability

4.6 out of 5

Average of 293 ratings from leading review sites.

Play.ht is highly praised for its diverse and realistic voice options, ease of use, and excellent customer support. Users appreciate the ability to create audio content efficiently, especially for multilingual and varied voice needs. However, some users note issues with natural inflection, especially with complex terms, and express concerns about the pricing structure and occasional technical glitches. The platform's continuous updates and addition of new features are well-received, though some desire more control over voice modulation and better integration with certain plugins.

Voice diversity

Ease of use

Customer support

Pricing

Natural inflection

Technical reliability

Compare Alternatives

LOVO AI vs. Unreal Speech

LOVO AI vs. Amazon Polly

LOVO AI vs. ElevenLabs

LOVO AI vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech

LOVO AI vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech

LOVO AI vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech

LOVO AI vs. Murf API

LOVO AI vs. Neets.ai

LOVO AI vs. IBM Watson

LOVO AI vs. Resemble.AI

LOVO AI vs. Deepgram Aura

Play.ht vs. Unreal Speech

Play.ht vs. Amazon Polly

Play.ht vs. ElevenLabs

Play.ht vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech

Play.ht vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech

Play.ht vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech

Play.ht vs. Murf API

Play.ht vs. Neets.ai

Play.ht vs. IBM Watson

Play.ht vs. Resemble.AI

Play.ht vs. Deepgram Aura

Summary

In comparing LOVO AI and Play.ht for text-to-speech services, Play.ht stands out for its superior voice quality, more comprehensive feature set, and better pricing structure.
While both platforms offer voice cloning and multi-lingual support, Play.ht provides additional functionalities like per-word timestamps and phone format support, making it a more versatile choice.
Overall, for users seeking high-quality, cost-effective, and feature-rich text-to-speech services, Play.ht is the preferable option.

Looking for a better alternative to LOVO AI & Play.ht?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free →

LOVO AI vs. Play.ht

Live Demo

Try our text-to-speech API. Click a button to generate random text:

LOVO AI

Play.ht

Voice Quality

LOVO AI Samples

Play.ht Samples

Features

LOVO AI Features

Play.ht Features

Features - Conclusion

Pricing & Plans

LOVO AI Pricing

Play.ht Pricing

Pricing & Plans - Conclusion

Customer Reviews

LOVO AI Reviews

Play.ht Reviews

Compare Alternatives

LOVO AI Alternatives

Play.ht Alternatives

Summary

Looking for a better alternative to LOVO AI & Play.ht?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Recent Posts