Contact Us
Sign In

LOVO AI Alternative

Unreal Speech is up to 15x cheaper, offers 82x more free monthly characters, and includes per-word timestamps, making it the best LOVO AI alternative.

Get Started for Free

Live Demo

Try our text-to-speech API. Click a button to generate random text:

Non-Fiction
Fiction
News
Blog
Conversation
0/250
Filesize
0 kb
Text to speech API - Unreal Speech

Unreal Speech

Cost-effective, scalable Text-to-Speech API with realistic human-like AI voices.
Text to speech API - LOVO AI

LOVO AI

Hyper realistic AI voice generator that captivate your audience.

Voice Quality

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
4.72
Non-Fiction
4.37
Conversation
3.91
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.

Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
  • LOVO AI provides voice cloning and multilingual capabilities but lacks per-word timestamps, pitch control, and phone format support.
  • Unreal Speech offers per-word timestamps, which are crucial for creating accurate subtitles and syncing words with audio in various applications.
  • It also supports pitch and speed control, along with phone formats compatibility, making it versatile for IVR systems and other telecommunication applications.

Pricing & Plans

Free
$0/mo
250,000 characters
Basic
$49/mo
3M characters
Extra: $16 per 1M chars
Plus
$499/mo
42M characters
Extra: $12 per 1M chars
Pro
$1499/mo
150M characters
Extra: $10 per 1M chars
Enterprise
$4999/mo
625M characters
Extra: $8 per 1M chars
Free
$0/mo
5 minutes (~3K chars)
Basic
$29/mo
2 hours (~80K chars)
Pro
$48/mo
5 hours (~200K chars)
Pro +
$149/mo
20 hours (~800K chars)
  • Unreal Speech is significantly more cost-effective than LOVO AI across all pricing tiers, offering a generous 250,000 characters for free compared to LOVO's 5 minutes (approximately 3,000 characters).
  • In paid tiers, Unreal Speech maintains a lower cost per million characters, with the cost decreasing as the plans scale up.
  • LOVO AI, lacking a free plan, starts at $29 for a much smaller character limit, and when comparing the Pro plans, Unreal Speech offers 15x the characters for the same price.
  • Unreal Speech's pricing model provides a more economical option for users requiring large volumes of text-to-speech conversion.

Customer Reviews

4.8 out of 5
Average of 10 ratings from leading review sites.
Customers appreciate Unreal Speech's Text-to-Speech API for its affordability, ease of setup, and generous free tier. They find the API to be a cost-effective solution compared to competitors, with clear documentation and responsive customer support. The API is praised for its natural-sounding voices and seamless integration into various projects. However, customers express a desire for more voice customization options, support for multiple languages and improvements in voice realism.
Affordability
Ease of setup
Voice quality
Documentation
Voice realism
Multilingual support
Customization
3.4 out of 5
Average of 200 ratings from leading review sites.
Customers appreciate LOVO AI for its realistic and diverse AI voices, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness. Many find it a valuable tool for creating voiceovers and content across various languages. However, some users report issues with robotic-sounding voices in certain languages, limited emotional range, and occasional technical glitches. The customer support and interface improvements are also areas highlighted for enhancement. Despite these issues, many users see LOVO as a beneficial tool for efficient and flexible voice generation.
Voice realism
Ease of use
Cost-effectiveness
Language diversity
Emotional range
Customer support
Technical stability

Summary

  • Unreal Speech provides a more cost-effective solution for text-to-speech needs, especially for users requiring large volumes of content, offering substantial character counts across its pricing tiers.
  • It brings valuable features such as per-word timestamps, pitch, and speed control, catering to a wide range of applications.
  • While LOVO AI has the edge in voice cloning and multilingual support, it falls short in providing the comprehensive feature set and affordability that Unreal Speech offers.
  • Overall, Unreal Speech stands out for its economical pricing and robust features, making it a preferable choice for extensive text-to-speech conversion requirements.

Ready to try the #1 LOVO AI Alternative?

You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free

Frequently Asked Questions

How easy is it to switch from LOVO AI to Unreal Speech?
  • Very easy, it only takes a few minutes. We give you 250,000 free characters per month, so you can start using our simple text-to-speech API right away.
Which service is more budget-friendly for startups and small businesses?
  • Unreal Speech presents a more budget-friendly option, especially with its generous free tier offering 250,000 characters per month.
  • This can be highly beneficial for startups and small businesses with limited budgets but requiring high volumes of text-to-speech conversion.
  • LOVO AI's free plan offers significantly fewer characters, making Unreal Speech a more economical option for emerging businesses.
For applications requiring precise audio and text synchronization, which service is more appropriate?
  • Unreal Speech provides per-word timestamps, making it the superior choice for applications that require precise synchronization between audio and text, such as captioning, subtitling, and detailed audio editing tasks.
  • This feature is absent in LOVO AI, making Unreal Speech the better option for projects demanding high synchronization accuracy.
For educational content, which service offers better features?
  • If the educational content requires voice cloning to mimic specific characters or needs multilingual support, LOVO AI would be the better choice.
  • However, if the focus is on creating educational videos or materials that require precise timing between text and speech, Unreal Speech, with its per-word timestamps, would be more suitable.
Which platform is more suited for telecommunication applications, like IVR systems?
  • Unreal Speech supports phone formats and offers pitch and speed control, making it highly suitable for telecommunication applications such as Interactive Voice Response (IVR) systems.
More Comparisons
Sign In