API Docs Pricing Studio Blog
Contact Us
Sign In

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Alternative

Unreal Speech is up to 2x cheaper, has more realistic voices, and a simpler API, making it the best Google Text-to-Speech alternative.

Get Started for Free →

Live Demo

Try our text-to-speech API. Click a button to generate random text:

Non-Fiction
Fiction
News
Blog
Conversation
0/250
Voice
Format
Normal
Speed
Filesize
0 kb
Text to speech API - Unreal Speech

Unreal Speech

Cost-effective, scalable Text-to-Speech API with realistic human-like AI voices.
Text to speech API - Google Cloud Text-to-Speech

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech

Allows developers to create natural-sounding, synthetic human speech as playable audio.

Voice Quality

Unreal Speech Samples

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
4.72
Non-Fiction
4.37
Conversation
3.91

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Samples

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
3.93
Non-Fiction
3.82
Conversation
3.42
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.

Voice Quality - Conclusion

  • Unreal Speech exhibits superior voice quality across fiction, non-fiction, and conversation categories, as evidenced by its higher Mean Opinion Scores compared to Google Cloud Text-to-Speech.
  • Specifically, it shines in fiction with a notable score of 4.72.
  • This suggests that Unreal Speech offers a more realistic and human-like listening experience.

Features

Unreal Speech Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Features - Conclusion

  • Unreal Speech offers a unique set of features tailored for high-quality text-to-speech conversion without voice cloning and multi-lingual capabilities, focusing instead on control over pitch, speed, and providing per-word timestamps.
  • Google Cloud Text-to-Speech, on the other hand, supports voice cloning and multi-lingual text-to-speech, making it versatile for a broader range of applications but lacks per-word timestamp functionality.
  • Both services provide pitch and speed control, as well as support for phone formats.
  • The choice between them would hinge on the specific needs for voice cloning, language support, and detailed audio customization.

Pricing & Plans

Unreal Speech Pricing

Free
$0/mo
250,000 characters
Basic
$49/mo
3M characters
Extra: $16 per 1M chars
Plus
$499/mo
42M characters
Extra: $12 per 1M chars
Pro
$1499/mo
150M characters
Extra: $10 per 1M chars
Enterprise
$4999/mo
625M characters
Extra: $8 per 1M chars

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Pricing

Free
$0/mo
1M characters
Pay As You Go
$16per
1M characters

Pricing & Plans - Conclusion

  • Unreal Speech offers a more cost-effective and scalable pricing structure compared to Google Cloud Text-to-Speech.
  • For example, at the highest tier, Unreal Speech's Enterprise plan provides 625M characters for $4999 per month, which is significantly cheaper than Google Cloud's Pay As You Go rate of $16 per 1M characters.
  • When comparing these rates, Unreal Speech's offering is approximately 2x more cost-efficient for high-volume users, providing a much larger pool of characters for a fixed monthly fee, whereas Google Cloud's model would necessitate a significantly higher expenditure for an equivalent number of characters.

Customer Reviews

Unreal Speech Reviews

4.8 out of 5
Average of 10 ratings from leading review sites.
Customers appreciate Unreal Speech's Text-to-Speech API for its affordability, ease of setup, and generous free tier. They find the API to be a cost-effective solution compared to competitors, with clear documentation and responsive customer support. The API is praised for its natural-sounding voices and seamless integration into various projects. However, customers express a desire for more voice customization options, support for multiple languages and improvements in voice realism.
Affordability
Ease of setup
Voice quality
Documentation
Voice realism
Multilingual support
Customization

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Reviews

4.6 out of 5
Average of 163 ratings from leading review sites.
Customers appreciate Google Cloud Text-to-Speech for its multilingual support, high-quality voices, and ease of integration. It is praised for its ability to handle various languages and accents, making it versatile for different applications. However, users are dissatisfied with its dependency on internet connectivity and find the pricing structure confusing and potentially costly. The lack of offline functionality is a significant drawback for many. Despite these issues, the service is valued for its accessibility features and seamless integration with other Google services.
Multilingual support
Voice quality
Ease of integration
Internet dependency
Pricing transparency
Offline functionality

Compare Alternatives

Unreal Speech Alternatives

Unreal Speech vs. Amazon Polly
Unreal Speech vs. ElevenLabs
Unreal Speech vs. Play.ht
Unreal Speech vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech
Unreal Speech vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech
Unreal Speech vs. Murf API
Unreal Speech vs. Neets.ai
Unreal Speech vs. IBM Watson
Unreal Speech vs. Resemble.AI
Unreal Speech vs. LOVO AI
Unreal Speech vs. Deepgram Aura

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Alternatives

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Amazon Polly
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. ElevenLabs
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Play.ht
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Murf API
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Neets.ai
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. IBM Watson
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Resemble.AI
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. LOVO AI
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Deepgram Aura

Summary

  • Unreal Speech provides a higher quality of synthetic voice across different categories compared to Google Cloud Text-to-Speech, evident from its superior Mean Opinion Scores.
  • However, it lacks features like voice cloning and multilingual support, which Google offers.
  • In terms of pricing, Unreal Speech offers more generous free tier limits and scaled pricing options for higher usage needs, making it a cost-effective choice for projects with large volume requirements.
  • Google's model, while potentially more expensive for high usage, provides flexibility with its pay-as-you-go pricing.

Ready to try the #1 Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Alternative?

You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free →

Frequently Asked Questions

How easy is it to switch from Google Cloud Text-to-Speech to Unreal Speech?
  • Very easy, it only takes a few minutes. We give you 250,000 free characters per month, so you can start using our simple text-to-speech API right away.
 What makes Unreal Speech particularly appealing for creators focusing on audio books and narrative podcasts?
  • With its superior voice quality, especially in fiction, and features like pitch and speed control, Unreal Speech is particularly appealing for audio book and narrative podcast creators, offering an engaging and immersive listening experience.
 Is Unreal Speech a cost-effective solution for startups and individual developers?
  • Absolutely, with a free tier offering 250,000 characters per month, it's an excellent starting point for cost-sensitive projects, providing great value and scalability.
 How does the pricing of Unreal Speech compare to Google Cloud Text-to-Speech for high-volume needs?
  • Unreal Speech offers competitively priced plans for high-volume users, such as the Pro plan at $1499 for 150M characters, making it a more economical choice for large-scale deployments compared to Google Cloud's pay-as-you-go model.
 What advantages does Unreal Speech offer for developers working on interactive applications?
  • The per-word timestamps feature of Unreal Speech is particularly beneficial for interactive applications, enabling precise timing for spoken words, thus enhancing user interaction and engagement.
More Comparisons →
Made with ❤️ in SF
Founder
API Docs Pricing Studio Contact Blog Compare Browse AI Apps Affiliate

Recent Posts

Integrating FastSpeech 2 for Text-to-Speech Synthesis with Fairseq and Hugging Face Exploring the Potential of GPT-SoVITS-Fork for Text-to-Speech Applications Exploring the GPT-SoVITS Kancolle Zuikaku TTS Model: A Comprehensive Guide Exploring Voice Synthesis with ESPnet: A Deep Dive into the kan-bayashi_csmsc_fastspeech Model Introducing OpenVoice: Revolutionizing Text-to-Speech with Instant Voice Cloning and Multilingual Capabilities How to Leverage Twelve Labs API for Effortless YouTube Video Summaries, Chapters, and Highlights
Sign In