API Docs Pricing Studio Blog
Contact Us
Sign In

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. IBM Watson

The best way to compare Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. IBM Watson: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

Get Started for Free →

Live Demo

Try our text-to-speech API. Click a button to generate random text:

Non-Fiction
Fiction
News
Blog
Conversation
0/250
Voice
Format
Normal
Speed
Filesize
0 kb
Text to speech API - Google Cloud Text-to-Speech

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech

Allows developers to create natural-sounding, synthetic human speech as playable audio.
Text to speech API - IBM Watson

IBM Watson

Convert text into natural-sounding speech in a variety of languages and voices.

Voice Quality

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Samples

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
3.93
Non-Fiction
3.82
Conversation
3.42

IBM Watson Samples

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.

Features

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

IBM Watson Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Features - Conclusion

  • Both Google Cloud Text-to-Speech and IBM Watson offer a robust set of features for text-to-speech conversion, including voice cloning, multi-lingual support, pitch and speed control, and support for phone formats.
  • However, IBM Watson distinguishes itself with the addition of per-word timestamps, a feature not available in Google Cloud Text-to-Speech.
  • This comparison highlights the importance of specific features like per-word timestamps for developers who may need fine-grained control over the timing of speech output.

Pricing & Plans

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Pricing

Free
$0/mo
1M characters
Pay As You Go
$16per
1M characters

IBM Watson Pricing

Free
$0/mo
10,000 characters
Standard
$20per
1M characters

Pricing & Plans - Conclusion

  • In terms of pricing, Google Cloud Text-to-Speech offers superior value, providing a generous free tier and more affordable paid options compared to IBM Watson Text-to-Speech.
  • Users seeking cost-effective solutions will find Google Cloud's offerings particularly attractive, with its free plan significantly outpacing IBM Watson's and its paid plan being more budget-friendly.
  • Overall, for those prioritizing cost in their selection of text-to-speech services, Google Cloud Text-to-Speech emerges as the clear choice.

Customer Reviews

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Reviews

4.6 out of 5
Average of 163 ratings from leading review sites.
Customers appreciate Google Cloud Text-to-Speech for its multilingual support, high-quality voices, and ease of integration. It is praised for its ability to handle various languages and accents, making it versatile for different applications. However, users are dissatisfied with its dependency on internet connectivity and find the pricing structure confusing and potentially costly. The lack of offline functionality is a significant drawback for many. Despite these issues, the service is valued for its accessibility features and seamless integration with other Google services.
Multilingual support
Voice quality
Ease of integration
Internet dependency
Pricing transparency
Offline functionality

IBM Watson Reviews

4.1 out of 5
Average of 44 ratings from leading review sites.
Customers appreciate IBM Watson Text to Speech for its ease of integration, speed, and support for multiple languages, making it versatile for various applications like education, customer service, and accessibility for the disabled. The ability to customize voice and tone is highly valued. However, some users note issues with pronunciation accuracy, limited language options, and occasional software glitches. The pricing is also considered high for small businesses or individual users.
Ease of integration
Speed
Language support
Customization
Pronunciation accuracy
Software reliability
Pricing
Language diversity

Compare Alternatives

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Alternatives

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Unreal Speech
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Amazon Polly
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. ElevenLabs
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Play.ht
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Murf API
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Neets.ai
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Resemble.AI
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. LOVO AI
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Deepgram Aura

IBM Watson Alternatives

IBM Watson vs. Unreal Speech
IBM Watson vs. Amazon Polly
IBM Watson vs. ElevenLabs
IBM Watson vs. Play.ht
IBM Watson vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech
IBM Watson vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech
IBM Watson vs. Murf API
IBM Watson vs. Neets.ai
IBM Watson vs. Resemble.AI
IBM Watson vs. LOVO AI
IBM Watson vs. Deepgram Aura

Summary

  • Google Cloud Text-to-Speech and IBM Watson both offer compelling text-to-speech services, with Google providing a more cost-effective solution and a higher free tier allowance, while IBM Watson offers unique features such as per-word timestamps for more detailed control.
  • In terms of voice quality, Google Cloud Text-to-Speech provides detailed mean opinion scores across different content types, indicating a strong performance in natural-sounding speech generation.
  • Ultimately, the choice between the two services may hinge on specific project requirements, with Google Cloud appealing to budget-conscious users and IBM Watson catering to those needing advanced speech synthesis features.

Looking for a better alternative to Google Cloud Text-to-Speech & IBM Watson?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free →
Made with ❤️ in SF
Founder
API Docs Pricing Studio Contact Blog Compare Browse AI Apps Affiliate

Recent Posts

Integrating FastSpeech 2 for Text-to-Speech Synthesis with Fairseq and Hugging Face Exploring the Potential of GPT-SoVITS-Fork for Text-to-Speech Applications Exploring the GPT-SoVITS Kancolle Zuikaku TTS Model: A Comprehensive Guide Exploring Voice Synthesis with ESPnet: A Deep Dive into the kan-bayashi_csmsc_fastspeech Model Introducing OpenVoice: Revolutionizing Text-to-Speech with Instant Voice Cloning and Multilingual Capabilities How to Leverage Twelve Labs API for Effortless YouTube Video Summaries, Chapters, and Highlights
Sign In