Contact Us
Sign In

IBM Watson vs. Murf API

The best way to compare IBM Watson vs. Murf API: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

Get Started for Free

Live Demo

Try our text-to-speech API. Click a button to generate random text:

Non-Fiction
Fiction
News
Blog
Conversation
0/250
Filesize
0 kb
Text to speech API - IBM Watson

IBM Watson

Convert text into natural-sounding speech in a variety of languages and voices.
Text to speech API - Murf API

Murf API

Deploy high quality voices for your apps, website and other services at scale.

Voice Quality

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.

Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
  • Both IBM Watson and Murf API offer a range of features that cater to the needs of developers and businesses looking to integrate text-to-speech capabilities into their applications, with both supporting voice cloning, multi-lingual capabilities, pitch and speed control, and compatibility with phone formats.
  • However, IBM Watson distinguishes itself with the provision of per-word timestamps, a feature not available in Murf API, potentially offering a more detailed level of control for synchronization purposes in applications.
  • On the other hand, both platforms are quite comparable in their core offerings, suggesting that the choice between them could come down to specific feature needs such as per-word timestamps or pricing considerations.

Pricing & Plans

Free
$0/mo
10,000 characters
Standard
$20per
1M characters
API Subscription
$3000/year
12M characters (per year)
  • In a direct comparison of pricing for text-to-speech services, IBM Watson's Standard Plan emerges as the more cost-effective option over Murf API's Subscription.
  • IBM Watson offers a lower overall cost for its service, making it a financially advantageous choice for users needing large volumes of text converted to speech.
  • This analysis strictly considers pricing, highlighting IBM Watson as the preferable option for those prioritizing budget.

Summary

  • When comparing IBM Watson and Murf API for text-to-speech services, IBM Watson stands out as the more cost-effective and feature-rich option, particularly due to its per-word timestamps and lower pricing structure.
  • Both services offer high-quality voices, multi-lingual support, and voice cloning capabilities, making them suitable for a wide range of applications.
  • However, IBM Watson's additional features and competitive pricing make it a more attractive choice for users seeking detailed control and affordability in text-to-speech services.

Looking for a better alternative to IBM Watson & Murf API?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free
Sign In