API Docs Pricing Studio Blog
Contact Us
Sign In

IBM Watson vs. Murf API

The best way to compare IBM Watson vs. Murf API: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

Get Started for Free →

Live Demo

Try our text-to-speech API. Click a button to generate random text:

Non-Fiction
Fiction
News
Blog
Conversation
0/250
Voice
Format
Normal
Speed
Filesize
0 kb
Text to speech API - IBM Watson

IBM Watson

Convert text into natural-sounding speech in a variety of languages and voices.
Text to speech API - Murf API

Murf API

Deploy high quality voices for your apps, website and other services at scale.

Voice Quality

IBM Watson Samples

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A

Murf API Samples

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.

Features

IBM Watson Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Murf API Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Features - Conclusion

  • Both IBM Watson and Murf API offer a range of features that cater to the needs of developers and businesses looking to integrate text-to-speech capabilities into their applications, with both supporting voice cloning, multi-lingual capabilities, pitch and speed control, and compatibility with phone formats.
  • However, IBM Watson distinguishes itself with the provision of per-word timestamps, a feature not available in Murf API, potentially offering a more detailed level of control for synchronization purposes in applications.
  • On the other hand, both platforms are quite comparable in their core offerings, suggesting that the choice between them could come down to specific feature needs such as per-word timestamps or pricing considerations.

Pricing & Plans

IBM Watson Pricing

Free
$0/mo
10,000 characters
Standard
$20per
1M characters

Murf API Pricing

API Subscription
$3000/year
12M characters (per year)

Pricing & Plans - Conclusion

  • In a direct comparison of pricing for text-to-speech services, IBM Watson's Standard Plan emerges as the more cost-effective option over Murf API's Subscription.
  • IBM Watson offers a lower overall cost for its service, making it a financially advantageous choice for users needing large volumes of text converted to speech.
  • This analysis strictly considers pricing, highlighting IBM Watson as the preferable option for those prioritizing budget.

Customer Reviews

IBM Watson Reviews

4.1 out of 5
Average of 44 ratings from leading review sites.
Customers appreciate IBM Watson Text to Speech for its ease of integration, speed, and support for multiple languages, making it versatile for various applications like education, customer service, and accessibility for the disabled. The ability to customize voice and tone is highly valued. However, some users note issues with pronunciation accuracy, limited language options, and occasional software glitches. The pricing is also considered high for small businesses or individual users.
Ease of integration
Speed
Language support
Customization
Pronunciation accuracy
Software reliability
Pricing
Language diversity

Murf API Reviews

3.8 out of 5
Average of 819 ratings from leading review sites.
Murf API generally receives praise for its variety of natural-sounding voices, user-friendly interface, and quick setup, making it a popular choice for voiceover projects. Customers appreciate the diverse voice options and the ability to customize speech patterns. However, there are significant concerns about the pricing model, which many find too expensive and restrictive in terms of voice generation limits. Additionally, there are complaints about customer service and misleading information regarding free trials and subscriptions. Issues with billing practices and refund policies are also frequently mentioned, causing distrust among some users.
Voice quality
User interface
Setup
Voice variety
Customization
Pricing
Customer service
Billing practices
Refund policy

Compare Alternatives

IBM Watson Alternatives

IBM Watson vs. Unreal Speech
IBM Watson vs. Amazon Polly
IBM Watson vs. ElevenLabs
IBM Watson vs. Play.ht
IBM Watson vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech
IBM Watson vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech
IBM Watson vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech
IBM Watson vs. Neets.ai
IBM Watson vs. Resemble.AI
IBM Watson vs. LOVO AI
IBM Watson vs. Deepgram Aura

Murf API Alternatives

Murf API vs. Unreal Speech
Murf API vs. Amazon Polly
Murf API vs. ElevenLabs
Murf API vs. Play.ht
Murf API vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech
Murf API vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech
Murf API vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech
Murf API vs. Neets.ai
Murf API vs. Resemble.AI
Murf API vs. LOVO AI
Murf API vs. Deepgram Aura

Summary

  • When comparing IBM Watson and Murf API for text-to-speech services, IBM Watson stands out as the more cost-effective and feature-rich option, particularly due to its per-word timestamps and lower pricing structure.
  • Both services offer high-quality voices, multi-lingual support, and voice cloning capabilities, making them suitable for a wide range of applications.
  • However, IBM Watson's additional features and competitive pricing make it a more attractive choice for users seeking detailed control and affordability in text-to-speech services.

Looking for a better alternative to IBM Watson & Murf API?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free →
Made with ❤️ in SF
Founder
API Docs Pricing Studio Contact Blog Compare Browse AI Apps Affiliate

Recent Posts

Integrating FastSpeech 2 for Text-to-Speech Synthesis with Fairseq and Hugging Face Exploring the Potential of GPT-SoVITS-Fork for Text-to-Speech Applications Exploring the GPT-SoVITS Kancolle Zuikaku TTS Model: A Comprehensive Guide Exploring Voice Synthesis with ESPnet: A Deep Dive into the kan-bayashi_csmsc_fastspeech Model Introducing OpenVoice: Revolutionizing Text-to-Speech with Instant Voice Cloning and Multilingual Capabilities How to Leverage Twelve Labs API for Effortless YouTube Video Summaries, Chapters, and Highlights
Sign In