Murf API vs. Amazon Polly

The best way to compare Murf API vs. Amazon Polly: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

Get Started for Free →

Live Demo

Try our text-to-speech API. Click a button to generate random text:

Non-Fiction

Fiction

News

Blog

Conversation

0/250

Speed

0 s

Filesize

0 kb

Murf API

Deploy high quality voices for your apps, website and other services at scale.

Amazon Polly

Text-to-speech service to transform text into natural-sounding speech using deep learning technologies.

Voice Quality

Mean Opinion Score

Fiction

N/A

Non-Fiction

N/A

Conversation

N/A

Mean Opinion Score

Fiction

3.00

Non-Fiction

2.51

Conversation

2.63

Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.

Features

Voice Cloning

Multi-lingual

Per-word Timestamps

Pitch Control

Speed Control

Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Voice Cloning

Multi-lingual

Per-word Timestamps

Pitch Control

Speed Control

Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Both Murf API and Amazon Polly offer a range of features that cater to developers looking to integrate text-to-speech capabilities into their applications, with both supporting multi-lingual text, pitch and speed control, and compatibility with phone formats.
However, Murf API distinguishes itself with voice cloning capabilities, a feature not available in Amazon Polly.
On the other hand, Amazon Polly provides per-word timestamps, which could be crucial for applications requiring precise synchronization between text and speech, a feature that Murf API lacks.

Pricing & Plans

API Subscription

$3000/year

12M characters (per year)

Free

$0/mo

1M characters (for first 12 months only)

Pay As You Go

$16per

1M characters

Amazon Polly offers a more cost-effective solution for both initial and long-term text-to-speech needs compared to Murf API.
With a free tier for the first 12 months and a lower cost for additional usage, Amazon Polly is particularly advantageous for users with varying levels of text conversion requirements.
Overall, for those prioritizing budget, Amazon Polly presents a better value proposition over time.

Customer Reviews

3.8 out of 5

Average of 819 ratings from leading review sites.

Murf API generally receives praise for its variety of natural-sounding voices, user-friendly interface, and quick setup, making it a popular choice for voiceover projects. Customers appreciate the diverse voice options and the ability to customize speech patterns. However, there are significant concerns about the pricing model, which many find too expensive and restrictive in terms of voice generation limits. Additionally, there are complaints about customer service and misleading information regarding free trials and subscriptions. Issues with billing practices and refund policies are also frequently mentioned, causing distrust among some users.

Voice quality

User interface

Setup

Voice variety

Customization

Pricing

Customer service

Billing practices

Refund policy

4.4 out of 5

Average of 68 ratings from leading review sites.

Customers appreciate Amazon Polly for its natural-sounding voices, ease of use, and integration with AWS services. They find it beneficial for various applications like IVR systems, content creation, and multilingual support. However, concerns about cost, limited customization options, and occasional unnatural inflections in the voices are common. The service's scalability and fast response times are highlighted as significant advantages, helping businesses efficiently manage large-scale projects.

Ease of use

Natural-sounding voices

Integration with AWS

Scalability

Voice inflection

Cost

Customization options

Compare Alternatives

Murf API vs. Unreal Speech

Murf API vs. ElevenLabs

Murf API vs. Play.ht

Murf API vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech

Murf API vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech

Murf API vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech

Murf API vs. Neets.ai

Murf API vs. IBM Watson

Murf API vs. Resemble.AI

Murf API vs. LOVO AI

Murf API vs. Deepgram Aura

Amazon Polly vs. Unreal Speech

Amazon Polly vs. ElevenLabs

Amazon Polly vs. Play.ht

Amazon Polly vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech

Amazon Polly vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech

Amazon Polly vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech

Amazon Polly vs. Neets.ai

Amazon Polly vs. IBM Watson

Amazon Polly vs. Resemble.AI

Amazon Polly vs. LOVO AI

Amazon Polly vs. Deepgram Aura

Summary

When comparing Murf API and Amazon Polly for text-to-speech services, both platforms offer unique advantages.
Murf API stands out with its voice cloning feature and a comprehensive subscription plan, making it suitable for users needing advanced voice customization.
However, Amazon Polly presents a more budget-friendly option with its free tier and pay-as-you-go pricing, alongside offering per-word timestamps for precise text-to-speech synchronization, making it an attractive choice for a wide range of applications that require high-quality, cost-effective text-to-speech solutions.

Looking for a better alternative to Murf API & Amazon Polly?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free →

Murf API vs. Amazon Polly

Live Demo

Try our text-to-speech API. Click a button to generate random text:

Murf API

Amazon Polly

Voice Quality

Murf API Samples

Amazon Polly Samples

Features

Murf API Features

Amazon Polly Features

Features - Conclusion

Pricing & Plans

Murf API Pricing

Amazon Polly Pricing

Pricing & Plans - Conclusion

Customer Reviews

Murf API Reviews

Amazon Polly Reviews

Compare Alternatives

Murf API Alternatives

Amazon Polly Alternatives

Summary

Looking for a better alternative to Murf API & Amazon Polly?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Recent Posts