Contact Us
Sign In

Murf API vs. LOVO AI

The best way to compare Murf API vs. LOVO AI: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

Get Started for Free

Live Demo

Try our text-to-speech API. Click a button to generate random text:

Non-Fiction
Fiction
News
Blog
Conversation
0/250
Filesize
0 kb
Text to speech API - Murf API

Murf API

Deploy high quality voices for your apps, website and other services at scale.
Text to speech API - LOVO AI

LOVO AI

Hyper realistic AI voice generator that captivate your audience.

Voice Quality

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.

Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
  • Both Murf API and LOVO AI offer voice cloning and multi-lingual capabilities, catering to a wide range of applications and audiences.
  • However, Murf API provides more control over the voice output with features like pitch control, speed control, and support for phone formats, which LOVO AI lacks in some areas, such as pitch control and phone format compatibility.
  • Despite these differences, the choice between them may hinge on specific project requirements, such as the need for per-word timestamps or the preference for more nuanced voice customization options.

Pricing & Plans

API Subscription
$3000/year
12M characters (per year)
Free
$0/mo
5 minutes (~3K chars)
Basic
$29/mo
2 hours (~80K chars)
Pro
$48/mo
5 hours (~200K chars)
Pro +
$149/mo
20 hours (~800K chars)
  • For users with high volume text-to-speech needs, LOVO AI's Pro + Plan emerges as the most cost-effective option, offering the best value.
  • For those with moderate usage, LOVO AI still provides competitive pricing, particularly with its Pro Plan.
  • Murf API, while slightly more expensive for moderate use, offers a straightforward annual payment plan that may appeal to users looking for simplicity in billing.

Summary

  • When comparing Murf API and LOVO AI for text-to-speech services, both platforms offer unique strengths, with LOVO AI standing out for its cost-effectiveness across various usage levels and Murf API providing more advanced voice customization features such as pitch control and phone format support.
  • While the voice quality metrics are not provided, the feature sets suggest that both services cater to a wide range of applications with capabilities like voice cloning and multi-lingual support.
  • Ultimately, the choice between Murf API and LOVO AI will depend on the user's specific needs, whether they prioritize advanced voice customization options or are looking for the most economical solution for their text-to-speech requirements.

Looking for a better alternative to Murf API & LOVO AI?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free
Sign In