API Docs Pricing Studio Blog
Contact Us
Sign In

Murf API vs. LOVO AI

The best way to compare Murf API vs. LOVO AI: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

Get Started for Free →

Live Demo

Try our text-to-speech API. Click a button to generate random text:

Non-Fiction
Fiction
News
Blog
Conversation
0/250
Voice
Format
Normal
Speed
Filesize
0 kb
Text to speech API - Murf API

Murf API

Deploy high quality voices for your apps, website and other services at scale.
Text to speech API - LOVO AI

LOVO AI

Hyper realistic AI voice generator that captivate your audience.

Voice Quality

Murf API Samples

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A

LOVO AI Samples

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.

Features

Murf API Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

LOVO AI Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Features - Conclusion

  • Both Murf API and LOVO AI offer voice cloning and multi-lingual capabilities, catering to a wide range of applications and audiences.
  • However, Murf API provides more control over the voice output with features like pitch control, speed control, and support for phone formats, which LOVO AI lacks in some areas, such as pitch control and phone format compatibility.
  • Despite these differences, the choice between them may hinge on specific project requirements, such as the need for per-word timestamps or the preference for more nuanced voice customization options.

Pricing & Plans

Murf API Pricing

API Subscription
$3000/year
12M characters (per year)

LOVO AI Pricing

Free
$0/mo
5 minutes (~3K chars)
Basic
$29/mo
2 hours (~80K chars)
Pro
$48/mo
5 hours (~200K chars)
Pro +
$149/mo
20 hours (~800K chars)

Pricing & Plans - Conclusion

  • For users with high volume text-to-speech needs, LOVO AI's Pro + Plan emerges as the most cost-effective option, offering the best value.
  • For those with moderate usage, LOVO AI still provides competitive pricing, particularly with its Pro Plan.
  • Murf API, while slightly more expensive for moderate use, offers a straightforward annual payment plan that may appeal to users looking for simplicity in billing.

Customer Reviews

Murf API Reviews

3.8 out of 5
Average of 819 ratings from leading review sites.
Murf API generally receives praise for its variety of natural-sounding voices, user-friendly interface, and quick setup, making it a popular choice for voiceover projects. Customers appreciate the diverse voice options and the ability to customize speech patterns. However, there are significant concerns about the pricing model, which many find too expensive and restrictive in terms of voice generation limits. Additionally, there are complaints about customer service and misleading information regarding free trials and subscriptions. Issues with billing practices and refund policies are also frequently mentioned, causing distrust among some users.
Voice quality
User interface
Setup
Voice variety
Customization
Pricing
Customer service
Billing practices
Refund policy

LOVO AI Reviews

3.4 out of 5
Average of 200 ratings from leading review sites.
Customers appreciate LOVO AI for its realistic and diverse AI voices, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness. Many find it a valuable tool for creating voiceovers and content across various languages. However, some users report issues with robotic-sounding voices in certain languages, limited emotional range, and occasional technical glitches. The customer support and interface improvements are also areas highlighted for enhancement. Despite these issues, many users see LOVO as a beneficial tool for efficient and flexible voice generation.
Voice realism
Ease of use
Cost-effectiveness
Language diversity
Emotional range
Customer support
Technical stability

Compare Alternatives

Murf API Alternatives

Murf API vs. Unreal Speech
Murf API vs. Amazon Polly
Murf API vs. ElevenLabs
Murf API vs. Play.ht
Murf API vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech
Murf API vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech
Murf API vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech
Murf API vs. Neets.ai
Murf API vs. IBM Watson
Murf API vs. Resemble.AI
Murf API vs. Deepgram Aura

LOVO AI Alternatives

LOVO AI vs. Unreal Speech
LOVO AI vs. Amazon Polly
LOVO AI vs. ElevenLabs
LOVO AI vs. Play.ht
LOVO AI vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech
LOVO AI vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech
LOVO AI vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech
LOVO AI vs. Neets.ai
LOVO AI vs. IBM Watson
LOVO AI vs. Resemble.AI
LOVO AI vs. Deepgram Aura

Summary

  • When comparing Murf API and LOVO AI for text-to-speech services, both platforms offer unique strengths, with LOVO AI standing out for its cost-effectiveness across various usage levels and Murf API providing more advanced voice customization features such as pitch control and phone format support.
  • While the voice quality metrics are not provided, the feature sets suggest that both services cater to a wide range of applications with capabilities like voice cloning and multi-lingual support.
  • Ultimately, the choice between Murf API and LOVO AI will depend on the user's specific needs, whether they prioritize advanced voice customization options or are looking for the most economical solution for their text-to-speech requirements.

Looking for a better alternative to Murf API & LOVO AI?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free →
Made with ❤️ in SF
Founder
API Docs Pricing Studio Contact Blog Compare Browse AI Apps Affiliate

Recent Posts

Integrating FastSpeech 2 for Text-to-Speech Synthesis with Fairseq and Hugging Face Exploring the Potential of GPT-SoVITS-Fork for Text-to-Speech Applications Exploring the GPT-SoVITS Kancolle Zuikaku TTS Model: A Comprehensive Guide Exploring Voice Synthesis with ESPnet: A Deep Dive into the kan-bayashi_csmsc_fastspeech Model Introducing OpenVoice: Revolutionizing Text-to-Speech with Instant Voice Cloning and Multilingual Capabilities How to Leverage Twelve Labs API for Effortless YouTube Video Summaries, Chapters, and Highlights
Sign In