API Docs Pricing Studio Blog
Contact Us
Sign In

Murf API vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech

The best way to compare Murf API vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

Get Started for Free →

Live Demo

Try our text-to-speech API. Click a button to generate random text:

Non-Fiction
Fiction
News
Blog
Conversation
0/250
Voice
Format
Normal
Speed
Filesize
0 kb
Text to speech API - Murf API

Murf API

Deploy high quality voices for your apps, website and other services at scale.
Text to speech API - Google Cloud Text-to-Speech

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech

Allows developers to create natural-sounding, synthetic human speech as playable audio.

Voice Quality

Murf API Samples

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Samples

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
3.93
Non-Fiction
3.82
Conversation
3.42
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.

Features

Murf API Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Features - Conclusion

  • Both Murf API and Google Cloud Text-to-Speech offer a comprehensive set of features for text-to-speech services, including voice cloning, multi-lingual support, pitch and speed control, and compatibility with phone formats.
  • However, Murf API does not provide per-word timestamps, a feature also absent in Google Cloud Text-to-Speech, indicating a common limitation in their offerings.
  • Overall, the feature sets are quite similar, suggesting that the choice between them would likely depend on other factors such as voice quality, pricing, and specific use case requirements.

Pricing & Plans

Murf API Pricing

API Subscription
$3000/year
12M characters (per year)

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Pricing

Free
$0/mo
1M characters
Pay As You Go
$16per
1M characters

Pricing & Plans - Conclusion

  • Google Cloud Text-to-Speech stands out as the more cost-effective option for both low and high usage scenarios, thanks to its free tier for the first 1M characters each month and significantly lower costs for additional usage.
  • Murf API, with its annual subscription model, presents a higher cost, making it less appealing for users focused solely on pricing.
  • Overall, Google Cloud Text-to-Speech offers greater flexibility and affordability, making it the preferred choice for users looking to maximize value.

Customer Reviews

Murf API Reviews

3.8 out of 5
Average of 819 ratings from leading review sites.
Murf API generally receives praise for its variety of natural-sounding voices, user-friendly interface, and quick setup, making it a popular choice for voiceover projects. Customers appreciate the diverse voice options and the ability to customize speech patterns. However, there are significant concerns about the pricing model, which many find too expensive and restrictive in terms of voice generation limits. Additionally, there are complaints about customer service and misleading information regarding free trials and subscriptions. Issues with billing practices and refund policies are also frequently mentioned, causing distrust among some users.
Voice quality
User interface
Setup
Voice variety
Customization
Pricing
Customer service
Billing practices
Refund policy

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Reviews

4.6 out of 5
Average of 163 ratings from leading review sites.
Customers appreciate Google Cloud Text-to-Speech for its multilingual support, high-quality voices, and ease of integration. It is praised for its ability to handle various languages and accents, making it versatile for different applications. However, users are dissatisfied with its dependency on internet connectivity and find the pricing structure confusing and potentially costly. The lack of offline functionality is a significant drawback for many. Despite these issues, the service is valued for its accessibility features and seamless integration with other Google services.
Multilingual support
Voice quality
Ease of integration
Internet dependency
Pricing transparency
Offline functionality

Compare Alternatives

Murf API Alternatives

Murf API vs. Unreal Speech
Murf API vs. Amazon Polly
Murf API vs. ElevenLabs
Murf API vs. Play.ht
Murf API vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech
Murf API vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech
Murf API vs. Neets.ai
Murf API vs. IBM Watson
Murf API vs. Resemble.AI
Murf API vs. LOVO AI
Murf API vs. Deepgram Aura

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Alternatives

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Unreal Speech
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Amazon Polly
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. ElevenLabs
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Play.ht
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Neets.ai
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. IBM Watson
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Resemble.AI
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. LOVO AI
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Deepgram Aura

Summary

  • When comparing Murf API and Google Cloud Text-to-Speech, both services offer a robust set of features including voice cloning, multi-lingual support, and pitch and speed control, but lack per-word timestamps.
  • Google Cloud Text-to-Speech, however, provides a more cost-effective solution with its free tier and lower costs for additional usage, making it a preferable option for users with budget considerations.
  • Ultimately, the choice between the two may hinge on specific needs such as voice quality and specific application requirements, but Google Cloud Text-to-Speech stands out for its affordability and flexibility.

Looking for a better alternative to Murf API & Google Cloud Text-to-Speech?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free →
Made with ❤️ in SF
Founder
API Docs Pricing Studio Contact Blog Compare Browse AI Apps Affiliate

Recent Posts

Integrating FastSpeech 2 for Text-to-Speech Synthesis with Fairseq and Hugging Face Exploring the Potential of GPT-SoVITS-Fork for Text-to-Speech Applications Exploring the GPT-SoVITS Kancolle Zuikaku TTS Model: A Comprehensive Guide Exploring Voice Synthesis with ESPnet: A Deep Dive into the kan-bayashi_csmsc_fastspeech Model Introducing OpenVoice: Revolutionizing Text-to-Speech with Instant Voice Cloning and Multilingual Capabilities How to Leverage Twelve Labs API for Effortless YouTube Video Summaries, Chapters, and Highlights
Sign In