Contact Us
Sign In

Murf API vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech

The best way to compare Murf API vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

Get Started for Free

Live Demo

Try our text-to-speech API. Click a button to generate random text:

Non-Fiction
Fiction
News
Blog
Conversation
0/250
Filesize
0 kb
Text to speech API - Murf API

Murf API

Deploy high quality voices for your apps, website and other services at scale.
Text to speech API - Google Cloud Text-to-Speech

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech

Allows developers to create natural-sounding, synthetic human speech as playable audio.

Voice Quality

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
3.93
Non-Fiction
3.82
Conversation
3.42
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.

Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
  • Both Murf API and Google Cloud Text-to-Speech offer a comprehensive set of features for text-to-speech services, including voice cloning, multi-lingual support, pitch and speed control, and compatibility with phone formats.
  • However, Murf API does not provide per-word timestamps, a feature also absent in Google Cloud Text-to-Speech, indicating a common limitation in their offerings.
  • Overall, the feature sets are quite similar, suggesting that the choice between them would likely depend on other factors such as voice quality, pricing, and specific use case requirements.

Pricing & Plans

API Subscription
$3000/year
12M characters (per year)
Free
$0/mo
1M characters
Pay As You Go
$16per
1M characters
  • Google Cloud Text-to-Speech stands out as the more cost-effective option for both low and high usage scenarios, thanks to its free tier for the first 1M characters each month and significantly lower costs for additional usage.
  • Murf API, with its annual subscription model, presents a higher cost, making it less appealing for users focused solely on pricing.
  • Overall, Google Cloud Text-to-Speech offers greater flexibility and affordability, making it the preferred choice for users looking to maximize value.

Summary

  • When comparing Murf API and Google Cloud Text-to-Speech, both services offer a robust set of features including voice cloning, multi-lingual support, and pitch and speed control, but lack per-word timestamps.
  • Google Cloud Text-to-Speech, however, provides a more cost-effective solution with its free tier and lower costs for additional usage, making it a preferable option for users with budget considerations.
  • Ultimately, the choice between the two may hinge on specific needs such as voice quality and specific application requirements, but Google Cloud Text-to-Speech stands out for its affordability and flexibility.

Looking for a better alternative to Murf API & Google Cloud Text-to-Speech?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free
Sign In