Contact Us
Sign In

Murf API vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech

The best way to compare Murf API vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

Get Started for Free

Live Demo

Try our text-to-speech API. Click a button to generate random text:

Non-Fiction
Fiction
News
Blog
Conversation
0/250
Filesize
0 kb
Text to speech API - Murf API

Murf API

Deploy high quality voices for your apps, website and other services at scale.
Text to speech API - Microsoft Azure AI Speech

Microsoft Azure AI Speech

Enables your applications, tools, or devices to convert text into human-like synthesized speech.

Voice Quality

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
3.69
Non-Fiction
3.13
Conversation
3.18
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.

Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
  • Both Murf API and Microsoft Azure AI Speech offer a range of features that cater to the needs of developers looking to integrate text-to-speech capabilities into their applications, including voice cloning, multi-lingual support, pitch and speed control, and support for phone formats.
  • However, Microsoft Azure AI Speech distinguishes itself with the addition of per-word timestamps, a feature not available in Murf API, which could be crucial for applications requiring precise synchronization between text and speech.
  • Overall, while both services provide robust features for text-to-speech conversion, the choice between them may hinge on specific requirements such as the need for per-word timestamps or budget constraints.

Pricing & Plans

API Subscription
$3000/year
12M characters (per year)
Free
$0/mo
5 hours of audio (~225K chars)
Pay As You Go
$15per
1M characters
  • For users with low usage needs, Microsoft Azure AI Speech offers the best value with its free plan covering up to 225,000 characters per month.
  • For moderate to high usage, Microsoft Azure AI Speech remains the more cost-effective choice at $15 per 1M characters, significantly cheaper than Murf API's $250 per 1M characters.
  • Overall, Microsoft Azure AI Speech provides a more affordable solution across different usage levels compared to Murf API.

Customer Reviews

3.8 out of 5
Average of 819 ratings from leading review sites.
Murf API generally receives praise for its variety of natural-sounding voices, user-friendly interface, and quick setup, making it a popular choice for voiceover projects. Customers appreciate the diverse voice options and the ability to customize speech patterns. However, there are significant concerns about the pricing model, which many find too expensive and restrictive in terms of voice generation limits. Additionally, there are complaints about customer service and misleading information regarding free trials and subscriptions. Issues with billing practices and refund policies are also frequently mentioned, causing distrust among some users.
Voice quality
User interface
Setup
Voice variety
Customization
Pricing
Customer service
Billing practices
Refund policy
4.2 out of 5
Average of 88 ratings from leading review sites.
Customers appreciate Azure Text to Speech API for its ease of use, high-quality audio output, and seamless integration with other services. They find it particularly beneficial for accessibility and enhancing user experience across various applications. However, concerns about the cost and limited customization options are frequently mentioned. The API's multilingual support and continuous updates are praised, but some users desire improvements in voice naturalness and additional language options.
Ease of use
Integration
Accessibility
Audio quality
Multilingual support
Naturalness of voice
Cost
Customization

Summary

  • When comparing Murf API and Microsoft Azure AI Speech for text-to-speech services, Microsoft Azure AI Speech emerges as the more cost-effective and feature-rich option.
  • It offers competitive voice quality with the added benefit of per-word timestamps and a more affordable pricing structure, especially for users with varying usage needs.
  • Overall, while both services provide comprehensive features for developers, Microsoft Azure AI Speech stands out for its balance of quality, functionality, and affordability.

Looking for a better alternative to Murf API & Microsoft Azure AI Speech?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free
Sign In