Contact Us
Sign In

Murf API vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech

The best way to compare Murf API vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

Get Started for Free

Live Demo

Try our text-to-speech API. Click a button to generate random text:

Non-Fiction
Fiction
News
Blog
Conversation
0/250
Filesize
0 kb
Text to speech API - Murf API

Murf API

Deploy high quality voices for your apps, website and other services at scale.
Text to speech API - OpenAI Text-to-Speech

OpenAI Text-to-Speech

Convert text into lifelike spoken audio using one of the six built-in voices.

Voice Quality

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.

Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
  • The Murf API offers a more feature-rich text-to-speech service compared to OpenAI Text-to-Speech, including voice cloning, pitch control, speed control, and support for phone formats.
  • Both services support multiple languages, but OpenAI lacks several advanced features such as pitch and speed control.
  • Therefore, for users requiring more customization and control over their text-to-speech output, Murf API appears to be the more versatile option.

Pricing & Plans

API Subscription
$3000/year
12M characters (per year)
Pay As You Go
$15per
1M characters
Optimized for speed
Pay As You Go (TTS HD)
$30per
1M characters
Optimized for quality
  • In a direct comparison of pricing between Murf API and OpenAI Text-to-Speech, OpenAI emerges as the more cost-effective option, offering a lower overall cost for text-to-speech conversion.
  • While Murf API requires an annual subscription, OpenAI's pay-as-you-go model provides flexibility and affordability, making it an attractive choice for users with varying needs and budgets.
  • This pricing analysis highlights OpenAI Text-to-Speech as the superior option for those prioritizing cost efficiency in their text-to-speech services.

Summary

  • When comparing Murf API and OpenAI Text-to-Speech, it's evident that each service caters to different user needs and preferences.
  • Murf API stands out with its advanced features like voice cloning and pitch control, making it suitable for users seeking customization and versatility in their text-to-speech applications.
  • However, OpenAI Text-to-Speech offers a more cost-effective, pay-as-you-go pricing model, appealing to those prioritizing affordability and flexibility, despite its limited feature set.

Looking for a better alternative to Murf API & OpenAI Text-to-Speech?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free
Sign In