Allows developers to create natural-sounding, synthetic human speech as playable audio.
Voice Quality
OpenAI Text-to-Speech Samples
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Samples
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
3.93
Non-Fiction
3.82
Conversation
3.42
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems.
The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality.
These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.
Features
OpenAI Text-to-Speech Features
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Features
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Features - Conclusion
In comparing the features of OpenAI Text-to-Speech and Google Cloud Text-to-Speech, it's evident that Google Cloud offers a more feature-rich service.
Google Cloud supports voice cloning, pitch and speed control, and compatibility with phone formats, which OpenAI does not.
Additionally, both services support multi-lingual capabilities, but Google Cloud's broader range of features makes it a more versatile option for developers seeking to create natural-sounding, synthetic human speech.
Pricing & Plans
OpenAI Text-to-Speech Pricing
Pay As You Go
$15per
1M characters
Optimized for speed
Pay As You Go (TTS HD)
$30per
1M characters
Optimized for quality
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Pricing
Free
$0/mo
1M characters
Pay As You Go
$16per
1M characters
Pricing & Plans - Conclusion
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech stands out for initial or low-volume users with its free offering for the first 1M characters, making it an excellent choice for those starting out or with minimal needs.
For users with higher volume requirements, OpenAI Text-to-Speech becomes the more economical option due to its slightly lower ongoing costs.
Overall, the choice between the two services depends on the user's volume of usage, with Google Cloud offering better initial value and OpenAI providing cost benefits for more extensive use.
When comparing OpenAI Text-to-Speech and Google Cloud Text-to-Speech, Google Cloud emerges as the more versatile and feature-rich option, offering advanced functionalities like voice cloning, pitch and speed control, and a broader range of audio formats.
Although OpenAI presents a slightly more cost-effective solution for high-volume users, Google Cloud's free tier for the first 1M characters provides exceptional value for new or low-volume users.
Overall, Google Cloud Text-to-Speech not only offers better initial value but also a more comprehensive set of features, making it a superior choice for developers seeking to create high-quality, natural-sounding synthetic speech.
Looking for a better alternative to OpenAI Text-to-Speech & Google Cloud Text-to-Speech?
Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.