Deploy high quality voices for your apps, website and other services at scale.
Voice Quality
OpenAI Text-to-Speech Samples
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Murf API Samples
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems.
The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality.
These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.
Features
OpenAI Text-to-Speech Features
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Murf API Features
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Features - Conclusion
Comparing the features of OpenAI Text-to-Speech and Murf API, it's evident that Murf API offers a more comprehensive set of functionalities, including voice cloning, pitch and speed control, and support for phone formats, which OpenAI Text-to-Speech lacks.
Additionally, both services support multi-lingual capabilities, but Murf API's broader feature set positions it as a more versatile option for users needing advanced customization and integration capabilities in their text-to-speech applications.
However, OpenAI Text-to-Speech's feature set might still be suitable for users with more basic requirements or those specifically seeking the unique voices provided by OpenAI.
Pricing & Plans
OpenAI Text-to-Speech Pricing
Pay As You Go
$15per
1M characters
Optimized for speed
Pay As You Go (TTS HD)
$30per
1M characters
Optimized for quality
Murf API Pricing
API Subscription
$3000/year
12M characters (per year)
Pricing & Plans - Conclusion
In a direct comparison of pricing models, OpenAI Text-to-Speech emerges as the more cost-effective option for text-to-speech services, offering a significantly lower price point than Murf API.
While OpenAI charges a minimal fee for its services, Murf API's annual subscription model results in a higher overall cost for users.
This analysis focuses solely on the financial aspect of the services, highlighting OpenAI Text-to-Speech as the more budget-friendly choice for consumers seeking text-to-speech solutions.
In comparing OpenAI Text-to-Speech and Murf API, OpenAI offers a more cost-effective solution with a pay-as-you-go pricing model, making it accessible for users with basic text-to-speech needs.
However, Murf API provides a richer set of features, including voice cloning, pitch and speed control, and support for various audio formats, catering to users requiring advanced customization and functionality.
Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on the user's specific needs, balancing between affordability and a comprehensive feature set.
Looking for a better alternative to OpenAI Text-to-Speech & Murf API?
Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.