Contact Us
Sign In

OpenAI Text-to-Speech vs. Murf API

The best way to compare OpenAI Text-to-Speech vs. Murf API: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

Get Started for Free

Live Demo

Try our text-to-speech API. Click a button to generate random text:

Non-Fiction
Fiction
News
Blog
Conversation
0/250
Filesize
0 kb
Text to speech API - OpenAI Text-to-Speech

OpenAI Text-to-Speech

Convert text into lifelike spoken audio using one of the six built-in voices.
Text to speech API - Murf API

Murf API

Deploy high quality voices for your apps, website and other services at scale.

Voice Quality

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.

Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
  • Comparing the features of OpenAI Text-to-Speech and Murf API, it's evident that Murf API offers a more comprehensive set of functionalities, including voice cloning, pitch and speed control, and support for phone formats, which OpenAI Text-to-Speech lacks.
  • Additionally, both services support multi-lingual capabilities, but Murf API's broader feature set positions it as a more versatile option for users needing advanced customization and integration capabilities in their text-to-speech applications.
  • However, OpenAI Text-to-Speech's feature set might still be suitable for users with more basic requirements or those specifically seeking the unique voices provided by OpenAI.

Pricing & Plans

Pay As You Go
$15per
1M characters
Optimized for speed
Pay As You Go (TTS HD)
$30per
1M characters
Optimized for quality
API Subscription
$3000/year
12M characters (per year)
  • In a direct comparison of pricing models, OpenAI Text-to-Speech emerges as the more cost-effective option for text-to-speech services, offering a significantly lower price point than Murf API.
  • While OpenAI charges a minimal fee for its services, Murf API's annual subscription model results in a higher overall cost for users.
  • This analysis focuses solely on the financial aspect of the services, highlighting OpenAI Text-to-Speech as the more budget-friendly choice for consumers seeking text-to-speech solutions.

Summary

  • In comparing OpenAI Text-to-Speech and Murf API, OpenAI offers a more cost-effective solution with a pay-as-you-go pricing model, making it accessible for users with basic text-to-speech needs.
  • However, Murf API provides a richer set of features, including voice cloning, pitch and speed control, and support for various audio formats, catering to users requiring advanced customization and functionality.
  • Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on the user's specific needs, balancing between affordability and a comprehensive feature set.

Looking for a better alternative to OpenAI Text-to-Speech & Murf API?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free
Sign In