Contact Us
Sign In

OpenAI Text-to-Speech vs. Play.ht

The best way to compare OpenAI Text-to-Speech vs. Play.ht: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

Get Started for Free

Live Demo

Try our text-to-speech API. Click a button to generate random text:

Non-Fiction
Fiction
News
Blog
Conversation
0/250
Filesize
0 kb
Text to speech API - OpenAI Text-to-Speech

OpenAI Text-to-Speech

Convert text into lifelike spoken audio using one of the six built-in voices.
Text to speech API - Play.ht

Play.ht

Transform written content into high-quality, lifelike voiceovers with AI-powered text-to-speech technology.

Voice Quality

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
4.17
Non-Fiction
4.17
Conversation
3.48
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.

Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
  • In comparing the features of OpenAI Text-to-Speech and Play.ht, it's evident that Play.ht offers a more comprehensive suite of features, including voice cloning, per-word timestamps, speed control, and support for phone formats, which OpenAI Text-to-Speech lacks.
  • Additionally, Play.ht supports multi-lingual capabilities similar to OpenAI but extends its functionality with more user control options like pitch and speed adjustments.
  • This makes Play.ht a more versatile and customizable option for users needing advanced text-to-speech services.

Pricing & Plans

Pay As You Go
$15per
1M characters
Optimized for speed
Pay As You Go (TTS HD)
$30per
1M characters
Optimized for quality
Free
$0/mo
12,500 characters
Creator
$39/mo
250,000 characters
Unlimited
$99/mo
2.5M characters limit
  • OpenAI Text-to-Speech emerges as the most cost-effective option for scalable or significant text-to-speech needs, offering the lowest price at a flat rate for any volume of usage.
  • While Play.ht provides a free plan for users with minimal requirements, its paid plans are considerably more expensive compared to OpenAI's offering.
  • For those prioritizing budget over additional features, OpenAI Text-to-Speech presents the best value.

Summary

  • When comparing OpenAI Text-to-Speech and Play.ht, it's clear that each service caters to different user needs and preferences.
  • OpenAI Text-to-Speech offers a more cost-effective solution for users with extensive text-to-speech requirements, while Play.ht stands out with its superior range of features, including voice cloning and speed control, making it a more versatile choice for those seeking advanced customization options.
  • Ultimately, the decision between the two will depend on the user's specific needs regarding voice quality, feature set, and budget.

Looking for a better alternative to OpenAI Text-to-Speech & Play.ht?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free
Sign In