Transform written content into high-quality, lifelike voiceovers with AI-powered text-to-speech technology.
Voice Quality
OpenAI Text-to-Speech Samples
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Play.ht Samples
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
4.17
Non-Fiction
4.17
Conversation
3.48
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems.
The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality.
These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.
Features
OpenAI Text-to-Speech Features
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Play.ht Features
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Features - Conclusion
In comparing the features of OpenAI Text-to-Speech and Play.ht, it's evident that Play.ht offers a more comprehensive suite of features, including voice cloning, per-word timestamps, speed control, and support for phone formats, which OpenAI Text-to-Speech lacks.
Additionally, Play.ht supports multi-lingual capabilities similar to OpenAI but extends its functionality with more user control options like pitch and speed adjustments.
This makes Play.ht a more versatile and customizable option for users needing advanced text-to-speech services.
Pricing & Plans
OpenAI Text-to-Speech Pricing
Pay As You Go
$15per
1M characters
Optimized for speed
Pay As You Go (TTS HD)
$30per
1M characters
Optimized for quality
Play.ht Pricing
Free
$0/mo
12,500 characters
Creator
$39/mo
250,000 characters
Unlimited
$99/mo
2.5M characters limit
Pricing & Plans - Conclusion
OpenAI Text-to-Speech emerges as the most cost-effective option for scalable or significant text-to-speech needs, offering the lowest price at a flat rate for any volume of usage.
While Play.ht provides a free plan for users with minimal requirements, its paid plans are considerably more expensive compared to OpenAI's offering.
For those prioritizing budget over additional features, OpenAI Text-to-Speech presents the best value.
When comparing OpenAI Text-to-Speech and Play.ht, it's clear that each service caters to different user needs and preferences.
OpenAI Text-to-Speech offers a more cost-effective solution for users with extensive text-to-speech requirements, while Play.ht stands out with its superior range of features, including voice cloning and speed control, making it a more versatile choice for those seeking advanced customization options.
Ultimately, the decision between the two will depend on the user's specific needs regarding voice quality, feature set, and budget.
Looking for a better alternative to OpenAI Text-to-Speech & Play.ht?
Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.