Contact Us
Sign In

Play.ht vs. Amazon Polly

The best way to compare Play.ht vs. Amazon Polly: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

Get Started for Free

Live Demo

Try our text-to-speech API. Click a button to generate random text:

Non-Fiction
Fiction
News
Blog
Conversation
0/250
Filesize
0 kb
Text to speech API - Play.ht

Play.ht

Transform written content into high-quality, lifelike voiceovers with AI-powered text-to-speech technology.
Text to speech API - Amazon Polly

Amazon Polly

Text-to-speech service to transform text into natural-sounding speech using deep learning technologies.

Voice Quality

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
4.17
Non-Fiction
4.17
Conversation
3.48
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
3.00
Non-Fiction
2.51
Conversation
2.63
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.
  • Based on the provided Mean Opinion Scores, Play.ht offers superior voice quality across fiction, non-fiction, and conversation categories compared to Amazon Polly.
  • Play.ht's voice quality is particularly notable in fiction and non-fiction, with scores significantly higher than those of Amazon Polly.
  • This suggests that for applications requiring high-quality, lifelike voiceovers, Play.ht may be the preferable choice.

Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
  • Both Play.ht and Amazon Polly offer a range of features catering to diverse text-to-speech needs, including multi-lingual support, per-word timestamps, speed control, and compatibility with phone formats.
  • However, Play.ht distinguishes itself with voice cloning capabilities and lacks pitch control, whereas Amazon Polly provides pitch control but does not support voice cloning.
  • This comparison highlights the importance of specific features depending on the user's requirements, such as the need for voice cloning for personalized voiceovers or pitch control for more nuanced speech modulation.

Pricing & Plans

Free
$0/mo
12,500 characters
Creator
$39/mo
250,000 characters
Unlimited
$99/mo
2.5M characters limit
Free
$0/mo
1M characters (for first 12 months only)
Pay As You Go
$16per
1M characters
  • Amazon Polly emerges as the more economical choice for users with needs up to 1 million characters per month, especially attractive with its initial free offer and competitive Pay As You Go pricing.
  • Play.ht, on the other hand, becomes a preferable option for users with extremely high-volume requirements, offering better value at its Unlimited plan level.
  • Overall, Amazon Polly suits a broader range of users seeking cost efficiency, while Play.ht caters to those with substantial character demands.

Summary

  • In comparing Play.ht and Amazon Polly, Play.ht stands out for its superior voice quality, particularly in fiction and non-fiction, and offers unique features like voice cloning, making it ideal for users prioritizing lifelike voiceovers and specific customization needs.
  • Amazon Polly, on the other hand, presents a more cost-effective solution with its competitive pricing and features like pitch control, catering to a broader audience with varied text-to-speech requirements.
  • Ultimately, the choice between Play.ht and Amazon Polly hinges on the user's priorities, whether they value voice quality and specific features over cost efficiency and broader utility.

Looking for a better alternative to Play.ht & Amazon Polly?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free
Sign In