Convert text into lifelike spoken audio using one of the six built-in voices.
Voice Quality
Play.ht Samples
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
4.17
Non-Fiction
4.17
Conversation
3.48
OpenAI Text-to-Speech Samples
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems.
The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality.
These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.
Features
Play.ht Features
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
OpenAI Text-to-Speech Features
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Features - Conclusion
Play.ht offers a more feature-rich text-to-speech service compared to OpenAI Text-to-Speech, including voice cloning, per-word timestamps, and speed control, which are not available with OpenAI's offering.
Additionally, Play.ht supports phone formats and provides options for pitch control, further enhancing its versatility for different use cases.
In contrast, OpenAI's service is more basic, lacking these advanced features but still supports multiple languages.
Pricing & Plans
Play.ht Pricing
Free
$0/mo
12,500 characters
Creator
$39/mo
250,000 characters
Unlimited
$99/mo
2.5M characters limit
OpenAI Text-to-Speech Pricing
Pay As You Go
$15per
1M characters
Optimized for speed
Pay As You Go (TTS HD)
$30per
1M characters
Optimized for quality
Pricing & Plans - Conclusion
For users just starting out or with minimal text-to-speech needs, Play.ht offers an unbeatable value with its Free Plan.
However, when it comes to paid plans, OpenAI Text-to-Speech emerges as the more cost-effective option, providing the best value for users at any usage level.
This makes OpenAI Text-to-Speech the go-to choice for those seeking affordability without compromising on quality.
Considering voice quality, features, and pricing, Play.ht stands out for its higher voice quality scores and a broader range of features, including voice cloning and speed control, making it suitable for diverse and specialized needs.
However, OpenAI Text-to-Speech offers a more cost-effective solution for users with its straightforward pricing model, despite having fewer features.
Ultimately, the choice between Play.ht and OpenAI Text-to-Speech depends on the user's specific requirements for voice quality, feature richness, and budget constraints.
Looking for a better alternative to Play.ht & OpenAI Text-to-Speech?
Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.