Play.ht vs. LOVO AI

The best way to compare Play.ht vs. LOVO AI: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

Get Started for Free →

Live Demo

Try our text-to-speech API. Click a button to generate random text:

Non-Fiction

Fiction

News

Blog

Conversation

0/250

Speed

0 s

Filesize

0 kb

Play.ht

Transform written content into high-quality, lifelike voiceovers with AI-powered text-to-speech technology.

LOVO AI

Hyper realistic AI voice generator that captivate your audience.

Voice Quality

Mean Opinion Score

Fiction

4.17

Non-Fiction

4.17

Conversation

3.48

Mean Opinion Score

Fiction

N/A

Non-Fiction

N/A

Conversation

N/A

Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.

Features

Voice Cloning

Multi-lingual

Per-word Timestamps

Pitch Control

Speed Control

Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Voice Cloning

Multi-lingual

Per-word Timestamps

Pitch Control

Speed Control

Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Both Play.ht and LOVO AI offer voice cloning and multi-lingual capabilities, catering to a wide range of text-to-speech needs.
However, Play.ht provides additional features such as per-word timestamps and support for phone formats, which LOVO AI lacks, potentially making Play.ht more versatile for specific technical requirements.
On the other hand, LOVO AI's lack of pitch control, similar to Play.ht, and the absence of per-word timestamps suggest a more streamlined approach, possibly focusing on simplicity and ease of use.

Pricing & Plans

Free

$0/mo

12,500 characters

Creator

$39/mo

250,000 characters

Unlimited

$99/mo

2.5M characters limit

Free

$0/mo

5 minutes (~3K chars)

Basic

$29/mo

2 hours (~80K chars)

Pro

$48/mo

5 hours (~200K chars)

Pro +

$149/mo

20 hours (~800K chars)

In a pricing comparison between Play.ht and LOVO AI, Play.ht emerges as the more cost-effective option across various usage levels.
For users seeking a free option, Play.ht provides a larger character allowance in its free plan compared to LOVO AI.
At higher usage tiers, Play.ht continues to offer better value, making it a particularly attractive choice for users with extensive text-to-speech needs.

Customer Reviews

4.6 out of 5

Average of 293 ratings from leading review sites.

Play.ht is highly praised for its diverse and realistic voice options, ease of use, and excellent customer support. Users appreciate the ability to create audio content efficiently, especially for multilingual and varied voice needs. However, some users note issues with natural inflection, especially with complex terms, and express concerns about the pricing structure and occasional technical glitches. The platform's continuous updates and addition of new features are well-received, though some desire more control over voice modulation and better integration with certain plugins.

Voice diversity

Ease of use

Customer support

Pricing

Natural inflection

Technical reliability

3.4 out of 5

Average of 200 ratings from leading review sites.

Customers appreciate LOVO AI for its realistic and diverse AI voices, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness. Many find it a valuable tool for creating voiceovers and content across various languages. However, some users report issues with robotic-sounding voices in certain languages, limited emotional range, and occasional technical glitches. The customer support and interface improvements are also areas highlighted for enhancement. Despite these issues, many users see LOVO as a beneficial tool for efficient and flexible voice generation.

Voice realism

Ease of use

Cost-effectiveness

Language diversity

Emotional range

Customer support

Technical stability

Compare Alternatives

Play.ht vs. Unreal Speech

Play.ht vs. Amazon Polly

Play.ht vs. ElevenLabs

Play.ht vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech

Play.ht vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech

Play.ht vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech

Play.ht vs. Murf API

Play.ht vs. Neets.ai

Play.ht vs. IBM Watson

Play.ht vs. Resemble.AI

Play.ht vs. Deepgram Aura

LOVO AI vs. Unreal Speech

LOVO AI vs. Amazon Polly

LOVO AI vs. ElevenLabs

LOVO AI vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech

LOVO AI vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech

LOVO AI vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech

LOVO AI vs. Murf API

LOVO AI vs. Neets.ai

LOVO AI vs. IBM Watson

LOVO AI vs. Resemble.AI

LOVO AI vs. Deepgram Aura

Summary

Considering voice quality, features, and pricing, Play.ht appears to offer a more comprehensive and cost-effective text-to-speech service with higher voice quality scores and a broader range of features including per-word timestamps and phone format support.
While both services provide voice cloning and multi-lingual capabilities, Play.ht's larger character allowance in its free plan and better value in higher usage tiers make it an attractive option for users with diverse and extensive text-to-speech needs.
LOVO AI, with its streamlined approach, may still appeal to users prioritizing simplicity and ease of use despite its more limited feature set and character allowance in comparison.

Looking for a better alternative to Play.ht & LOVO AI?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free →

Play.ht vs. LOVO AI

Live Demo

Try our text-to-speech API. Click a button to generate random text:

Play.ht

LOVO AI

Voice Quality

Play.ht Samples

LOVO AI Samples

Features

Play.ht Features

LOVO AI Features

Features - Conclusion

Pricing & Plans

Play.ht Pricing

LOVO AI Pricing

Pricing & Plans - Conclusion

Customer Reviews

Play.ht Reviews

LOVO AI Reviews

Compare Alternatives

Play.ht Alternatives

LOVO AI Alternatives

Summary

Looking for a better alternative to Play.ht & LOVO AI?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Recent Posts