Play.ht vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech

The best way to compare Play.ht vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

Get Started for Free →

Live Demo

Try our text-to-speech API. Click a button to generate random text:

Non-Fiction

Fiction

News

Blog

Conversation

0/250

Speed

0 s

Filesize

0 kb

Play.ht

Transform written content into high-quality, lifelike voiceovers with AI-powered text-to-speech technology.

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech

Allows developers to create natural-sounding, synthetic human speech as playable audio.

Voice Quality

Mean Opinion Score

Fiction

4.17

Non-Fiction

4.17

Conversation

3.48

Mean Opinion Score

Fiction

3.93

Non-Fiction

3.82

Conversation

3.42

Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.

Based on the Mean Opinion Scores provided, Play.ht generally offers higher voice quality across fiction, non-fiction, and conversation categories compared to Google Cloud Text-to-Speech.
The scores indicate that users might find Play.ht's voiceovers to be more lifelike and engaging.
However, both services offer competitive quality, making them viable options depending on specific needs and preferences.

Features

Voice Cloning

Multi-lingual

Per-word Timestamps

Pitch Control

Speed Control

Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Voice Cloning

Multi-lingual

Per-word Timestamps

Pitch Control

Speed Control

Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Both Play.ht and Google Cloud Text-to-Speech offer a robust set of features for transforming text into speech, including voice cloning, multi-lingual support, and the ability to output in phone formats.
However, Play.ht distinguishes itself with the unique offering of per-word timestamps, which Google Cloud Text-to-Speech lacks, potentially making it more suitable for applications requiring precise synchronization between text and speech.
Conversely, Google Cloud Text-to-Speech provides pitch control, a feature absent in Play.ht, offering users more customization over the voice's tonal quality.

Pricing & Plans

Free

$0/mo

12,500 characters

Creator

$39/mo

250,000 characters

Unlimited

$99/mo

2.5M characters limit

Free

$0/mo

1M characters

Pay As You Go

$16per

1M characters

In a direct comparison of pricing tiers, Google Cloud Text-to-Speech emerges as the more cost-effective option across all levels of usage.
Its free plan is notably more generous than that of Play.ht, and its Pay As You Go rate offers substantial savings for both moderate and high usage scenarios.
Overall, for users prioritizing cost in their selection of a text-to-speech service, Google Cloud Text-to-Speech presents a more economical choice.

Customer Reviews

4.6 out of 5

Average of 293 ratings from leading review sites.

Play.ht is highly praised for its diverse and realistic voice options, ease of use, and excellent customer support. Users appreciate the ability to create audio content efficiently, especially for multilingual and varied voice needs. However, some users note issues with natural inflection, especially with complex terms, and express concerns about the pricing structure and occasional technical glitches. The platform's continuous updates and addition of new features are well-received, though some desire more control over voice modulation and better integration with certain plugins.

Voice diversity

Ease of use

Customer support

Pricing

Natural inflection

Technical reliability

4.6 out of 5

Average of 163 ratings from leading review sites.

Customers appreciate Google Cloud Text-to-Speech for its multilingual support, high-quality voices, and ease of integration. It is praised for its ability to handle various languages and accents, making it versatile for different applications. However, users are dissatisfied with its dependency on internet connectivity and find the pricing structure confusing and potentially costly. The lack of offline functionality is a significant drawback for many. Despite these issues, the service is valued for its accessibility features and seamless integration with other Google services.

Multilingual support

Voice quality

Ease of integration

Internet dependency

Pricing transparency

Offline functionality

Compare Alternatives

Play.ht vs. Unreal Speech

Play.ht vs. Amazon Polly

Play.ht vs. ElevenLabs

Play.ht vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech

Play.ht vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech

Play.ht vs. Murf API

Play.ht vs. Neets.ai

Play.ht vs. IBM Watson

Play.ht vs. Resemble.AI

Play.ht vs. LOVO AI

Play.ht vs. Deepgram Aura

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Unreal Speech

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Amazon Polly

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. ElevenLabs

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Murf API

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Neets.ai

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. IBM Watson

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Resemble.AI

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. LOVO AI

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Deepgram Aura

Summary

In comparing Play.ht and Google Cloud Text-to-Speech, Play.ht generally offers superior voice quality, making it a strong choice for users prioritizing lifelike and engaging voiceovers.
However, Google Cloud Text-to-Speech stands out for its cost-effectiveness and generous free tier, appealing to users with budget constraints.
Feature-wise, both services cater to a wide range of needs, but Play.ht's per-word timestamps and Google Cloud's pitch control highlight their respective focuses on synchronization and voice customization.

Looking for a better alternative to Play.ht & Google Cloud Text-to-Speech?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free →

Play.ht vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech

Live Demo

Try our text-to-speech API. Click a button to generate random text:

Play.ht

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech

Voice Quality

Play.ht Samples

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Samples

Voice Quality - Conclusion

Features

Play.ht Features

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Features

Features - Conclusion

Pricing & Plans

Play.ht Pricing

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Pricing

Pricing & Plans - Conclusion

Customer Reviews

Play.ht Reviews

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Reviews

Compare Alternatives

Play.ht Alternatives

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Alternatives

Summary

Looking for a better alternative to Play.ht & Google Cloud Text-to-Speech?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Recent Posts