API Docs Pricing Studio Blog
Contact Us
Sign In

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Neets.ai

The best way to compare Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Neets.ai: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

Get Started for Free →

Live Demo

Try our text-to-speech API. Click a button to generate random text:

Non-Fiction
Fiction
News
Blog
Conversation
0/250
Voice
Format
Normal
Speed
Filesize
0 kb
Text to speech API - Google Cloud Text-to-Speech

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech

Allows developers to create natural-sounding, synthetic human speech as playable audio.
Text to speech API - Neets.ai

Neets.ai

Affordable, high-quality AI Text-to-Speech (TTS) voice generation.

Voice Quality

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Samples

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
3.93
Non-Fiction
3.82
Conversation
3.42

Neets.ai Samples

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.

Features

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Neets.ai Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Features - Conclusion

  • Google Cloud Text-to-Speech offers a more comprehensive set of features compared to Neets.ai, including voice cloning, pitch control, and the ability to adjust speech speed, which can significantly enhance the customization and naturalness of the generated speech.
  • While both services support multi-lingual capabilities and phone formats, Neets.ai lacks some of the advanced features like voice cloning and pitch control, which may limit its versatility for certain applications.
  • However, both platforms cater to developers looking to integrate text-to-speech functionalities, with Google Cloud providing a more feature-rich environment for those needing greater control over the speech output.

Pricing & Plans

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Pricing

Free
$0/mo
1M characters
Pay As You Go
$16per
1M characters

Neets.ai Pricing

Free
$0/mo
25,000 characters
Pro
$6/mo
100,000 characters
Extra: $5 per 1M chars

Pricing & Plans - Conclusion

  • For users with low to moderate text-to-speech needs, Google Cloud Text-to-Speech emerges as the more economical choice, especially with its generous free tier and competitive Pay As You Go rate.
  • However, for those with high usage demands exceeding 1 million characters, Neets.ai becomes the more cost-effective option due to its significantly lower rate for additional usage beyond its Pro plan.
  • This makes Google Cloud Text-to-Speech ideal for casual or moderate users, while Neets.ai caters better to heavy users looking for a budget-friendly solution.

Compare Alternatives

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Alternatives

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Unreal Speech
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Amazon Polly
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. ElevenLabs
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Play.ht
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Murf API
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. IBM Watson
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Resemble.AI
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. LOVO AI
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Deepgram Aura

Neets.ai Alternatives

Neets.ai vs. Unreal Speech
Neets.ai vs. Amazon Polly
Neets.ai vs. ElevenLabs
Neets.ai vs. Play.ht
Neets.ai vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech
Neets.ai vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech
Neets.ai vs. Murf API
Neets.ai vs. IBM Watson
Neets.ai vs. Resemble.AI
Neets.ai vs. LOVO AI
Neets.ai vs. Deepgram Aura

Summary

  • Google Cloud Text-to-Speech stands out for its superior voice quality, comprehensive features including voice cloning and pitch control, and a generous free tier, making it an ideal choice for developers seeking high-quality, customizable speech synthesis.
  • Neets.ai, while more limited in features and voice quality data, offers a cost-effective solution for heavy users with its affordable pricing for high-volume needs.
  • Overall, Google Cloud Text-to-Speech caters to a broader range of needs with its advanced functionalities, whereas Neets.ai is a budget-friendly option for users with large-scale text-to-speech requirements.

Looking for a better alternative to Google Cloud Text-to-Speech & Neets.ai?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free →
Made with ❤️ in SF
Founder
API Docs Pricing Studio Contact Blog Compare Browse AI Apps Affiliate

Recent Posts

Integrating FastSpeech 2 for Text-to-Speech Synthesis with Fairseq and Hugging Face Exploring the Potential of GPT-SoVITS-Fork for Text-to-Speech Applications Exploring the GPT-SoVITS Kancolle Zuikaku TTS Model: A Comprehensive Guide Exploring Voice Synthesis with ESPnet: A Deep Dive into the kan-bayashi_csmsc_fastspeech Model Introducing OpenVoice: Revolutionizing Text-to-Speech with Instant Voice Cloning and Multilingual Capabilities How to Leverage Twelve Labs API for Effortless YouTube Video Summaries, Chapters, and Highlights
Sign In