Transform written content into high-quality, lifelike voiceovers with AI-powered text-to-speech technology.
Voice Quality
Neets.ai Samples
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Play.ht Samples
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
4.17
Non-Fiction
4.17
Conversation
3.48
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems.
The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality.
These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.
Features
Neets.ai Features
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Play.ht Features
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Features - Conclusion
Neets.ai and Play.ht both offer multi-lingual support and the ability to convert text-to-speech in various phone formats, catering to a wide range of users' needs.
However, Play.ht stands out with additional features such as voice cloning and per-word timestamps, enhancing its versatility for different applications like audiobook production or video voiceovers.
While Neets.ai lacks some advanced features like voice cloning and pitch control, its simplicity might appeal to users with straightforward text-to-speech needs.
Pricing & Plans
Neets.ai Pricing
Free
$0/mo
25,000 characters
Pro
$6/mo
100,000 characters
Extra: $5 per 1M chars
Play.ht Pricing
Free
$0/mo
12,500 characters
Creator
$39/mo
250,000 characters
Unlimited
$99/mo
2.5M characters limit
Pricing & Plans - Conclusion
In a comparison of Neets.ai and Play.ht based solely on pricing, Neets.ai emerges as the more cost-effective option for both low and high usage levels.
Neets.ai offers a more generous free plan and significantly lower costs for users with high to very high character usage.
Therefore, for users prioritizing budget, Neets.ai provides better overall value across various usage tiers.
When comparing Neets.ai and Play.ht in terms of voice quality, features, and pricing, Neets.ai offers a more budget-friendly solution with a generous free plan and lower costs for high usage, making it ideal for users with simple text-to-speech needs.
Play.ht, on the other hand, provides higher voice quality scores and advanced features like voice cloning and per-word timestamps, catering to users requiring more sophisticated applications such as audiobook production or video voiceovers.
Overall, the choice between Neets.ai and Play.ht depends on the user's specific needs, balancing between cost-effectiveness and the requirement for advanced features and higher voice quality.
Looking for a better alternative to Neets.ai & Play.ht?
Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.