Convert text into lifelike spoken audio using one of the six built-in voices.
Voice Quality
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Samples
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
3.93
Non-Fiction
3.82
Conversation
3.42
OpenAI Text-to-Speech Samples
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems.
The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality.
These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.
Features
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Features
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
OpenAI Text-to-Speech Features
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Features - Conclusion
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech offers a more feature-rich service compared to OpenAI Text-to-Speech, including voice cloning, pitch control, speed control, and support for phone formats.
Both services support multiple languages, but Google's offering is more versatile for developers looking to customize the audio output.
OpenAI's Text-to-Speech, while more limited in features, may still be suitable for applications that require straightforward text-to-speech conversion without the need for advanced customization.
Pricing & Plans
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Pricing
Free
$0/mo
1M characters
Pay As You Go
$16per
1M characters
OpenAI Text-to-Speech Pricing
Pay As You Go
$15per
1M characters
Optimized for speed
Pay As You Go (TTS HD)
$30per
1M characters
Optimized for quality
Pricing & Plans - Conclusion
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech stands out for users with low usage needs by offering a valuable free tier, making it an excellent choice for those just starting out or with minimal requirements.
On the other hand, OpenAI Text-to-Speech becomes the more cost-effective option for users with higher usage demands, edging out Google Cloud by being slightly cheaper for extensive use.
Overall, while Google Cloud Text-to-Speech provides an initial cost advantage with its free offering, OpenAI Text-to-Speech offers a better deal for users with larger, ongoing text-to-speech needs.
In comparing Google Cloud Text-to-Speech and OpenAI Text-to-Speech, Google Cloud offers a more comprehensive service with higher voice quality scores, a broader range of features including voice cloning and audio customization, and a valuable free tier for low usage needs.
OpenAI's Text-to-Speech, while more limited in features and without a free tier, presents a slightly more cost-effective option for users with higher usage demands.
Overall, Google Cloud Text-to-Speech is better suited for users seeking quality and versatility in their text-to-speech applications, whereas OpenAI's service may appeal to those prioritizing cost for larger projects.
Looking for a better alternative to Google Cloud Text-to-Speech & OpenAI Text-to-Speech?
Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.