Contact Us
Sign In

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. LOVO AI

The best way to compare Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. LOVO AI: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

Get Started for Free

Live Demo

Try our text-to-speech API. Click a button to generate random text:

Non-Fiction
Fiction
News
Blog
Conversation
0/250
Filesize
0 kb
Text to speech API - Google Cloud Text-to-Speech

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech

Allows developers to create natural-sounding, synthetic human speech as playable audio.
Text to speech API - LOVO AI

LOVO AI

Hyper realistic AI voice generator that captivate your audience.

Voice Quality

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
3.93
Non-Fiction
3.82
Conversation
3.42
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.

Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
  • Both Google Cloud Text-to-Speech and LOVO AI offer voice cloning and multi-lingual capabilities, catering to a wide range of applications and user needs.
  • However, Google Cloud Text-to-Speech provides more advanced features such as pitch control and support for phone formats, which could be crucial for developers requiring more customization and integration options.
  • On the other hand, LOVO AI lacks these advanced features, indicating a potentially simpler user experience but with less flexibility for intricate audio production needs.

Pricing & Plans

Free
$0/mo
1M characters
Pay As You Go
$16per
1M characters
Free
$0/mo
5 minutes (~3K chars)
Basic
$29/mo
2 hours (~80K chars)
Pro
$48/mo
5 hours (~200K chars)
Pro +
$149/mo
20 hours (~800K chars)
  • In a direct comparison of pricing between Google Cloud Text-to-Speech and LOVO AI, Google Cloud Text-to-Speech emerges as the more cost-effective option across all usage levels.
  • Its Pay As You Go plan significantly undercuts the per-unit cost of LOVO AI's offerings, making it the superior choice for users prioritizing budget.
  • Even LOVO AI's most economical plan, Pro +, remains considerably more expensive than Google Cloud's solution, highlighting the latter's advantage in cost efficiency for text-to-speech services.

Customer Reviews

4.6 out of 5
Average of 163 ratings from leading review sites.
Customers appreciate Google Cloud Text-to-Speech for its multilingual support, high-quality voices, and ease of integration. It is praised for its ability to handle various languages and accents, making it versatile for different applications. However, users are dissatisfied with its dependency on internet connectivity and find the pricing structure confusing and potentially costly. The lack of offline functionality is a significant drawback for many. Despite these issues, the service is valued for its accessibility features and seamless integration with other Google services.
Multilingual support
Voice quality
Ease of integration
Internet dependency
Pricing transparency
Offline functionality
3.4 out of 5
Average of 200 ratings from leading review sites.
Customers appreciate LOVO AI for its realistic and diverse AI voices, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness. Many find it a valuable tool for creating voiceovers and content across various languages. However, some users report issues with robotic-sounding voices in certain languages, limited emotional range, and occasional technical glitches. The customer support and interface improvements are also areas highlighted for enhancement. Despite these issues, many users see LOVO as a beneficial tool for efficient and flexible voice generation.
Voice realism
Ease of use
Cost-effectiveness
Language diversity
Emotional range
Customer support
Technical stability

Summary

  • When comparing Google Cloud Text-to-Speech and LOVO AI, Google Cloud offers a more cost-effective solution with a broader set of features, including pitch control and support for phone formats, making it suitable for developers seeking customization and integration capabilities.
  • Although both services provide voice cloning and multi-lingual support, Google Cloud Text-to-Speech also demonstrates higher voice quality scores across different content types.
  • Consequently, Google Cloud Text-to-Speech stands out as the superior choice for users prioritizing budget, feature richness, and voice quality in their text-to-speech applications.

Looking for a better alternative to Google Cloud Text-to-Speech & LOVO AI?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free
Sign In