Hyper realistic AI voice generator that captivate your audience.
Voice Quality
OpenAI Text-to-Speech Samples
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
LOVO AI Samples
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems.
The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality.
These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.
Features
OpenAI Text-to-Speech Features
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
LOVO AI Features
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Features - Conclusion
OpenAI Text-to-Speech and LOVO AI both offer multi-lingual support, catering to a global audience, but they differ significantly in their additional features.
LOVO AI stands out with its voice cloning capability and speed control, offering more customization for users, whereas OpenAI Text-to-Speech does not support these features.
This comparison highlights LOVO AI's broader range of features, making it potentially more versatile for users needing more control over their text-to-speech outputs.
Pricing & Plans
OpenAI Text-to-Speech Pricing
Pay As You Go
$15per
1M characters
Optimized for speed
Pay As You Go (TTS HD)
$30per
1M characters
Optimized for quality
LOVO AI Pricing
Free
$0/mo
5 minutes (~3K chars)
Basic
$29/mo
2 hours (~80K chars)
Pro
$48/mo
5 hours (~200K chars)
Pro +
$149/mo
20 hours (~800K chars)
Pricing & Plans - Conclusion
OpenAI Text-to-Speech offers the most cost-effective solution for high-volume users, providing a significant value in terms of overall pricing.
LOVO AI, on the other hand, caters well to users with minimal or occasional text-to-speech needs through its free plan, despite its character limitations.
For those requiring more extensive usage without the constraints of a free plan, LOVO AI's tiered pricing still presents higher costs compared to OpenAI's straightforward, pay-as-you-go approach.
In comparing OpenAI Text-to-Speech and LOVO AI, it's evident that each service caters to different user needs and preferences.
OpenAI Text-to-Speech offers a more cost-effective solution for users with high-volume needs, while LOVO AI provides greater feature flexibility, including voice cloning and speed control, making it suitable for users seeking more customization in their text-to-speech outputs.
Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on the user's specific requirements regarding voice quality, feature set, and pricing structure.
Looking for a better alternative to OpenAI Text-to-Speech & LOVO AI?
Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.