Contact Us
Sign In

Amazon Polly vs. Murf API

The best way to compare Amazon Polly vs. Murf API: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

Get Started for Free

Live Demo

Try our text-to-speech API. Click a button to generate random text:

Non-Fiction
Fiction
News
Blog
Conversation
0/250
Filesize
0 kb
Text to speech API - Amazon Polly

Amazon Polly

Text-to-speech service to transform text into natural-sounding speech using deep learning technologies.
Text to speech API - Murf API

Murf API

Deploy high quality voices for your apps, website and other services at scale.

Voice Quality

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
3.00
Non-Fiction
2.51
Conversation
2.63
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.

Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
  • Amazon Polly and Murf API both offer multi-lingual support, pitch and speed control, and support for phone formats like pcm_mulaw, catering to a wide range of text-to-speech needs.
  • However, Murf API distinguishes itself with the capability for voice cloning, a feature not available in Amazon Polly, potentially offering a more personalized experience for users.
  • On the other hand, Amazon Polly provides per-word timestamps, which could be crucial for applications requiring precise synchronization between text and speech.

Pricing & Plans

Free
$0/mo
1M characters (for first 12 months only)
Pay As You Go
$16per
1M characters
API Subscription
$3000/year
12M characters (per year)
  • Amazon Polly emerges as the more cost-effective option for both new users and those with ongoing text-to-speech needs, offering a free tier for the first 12 months and a competitive Pay As You Go rate thereafter.
  • In contrast, Murf API, with its annual subscription model, presents a higher cost per million characters, making it less economical for users prioritizing budget.
  • However, for users with specific needs that justify the expense, such as voice cloning, Murf API's pricing may be considered reasonable.

Summary

  • In comparing Amazon Polly and Murf API for text-to-speech services, Amazon Polly offers a more cost-effective solution with competitive pricing and a free tier, alongside decent voice quality scores and a range of features including per-word timestamps and multi-lingual support.
  • Murf API, while more expensive, distinguishes itself with the unique feature of voice cloning and also supports multi-lingual capabilities, pitch, and speed control.
  • Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on specific user needs, with Amazon Polly appealing to those prioritizing budget and basic features, and Murf API catering to users requiring advanced features like voice cloning.

Looking for a better alternative to Amazon Polly & Murf API?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free
Sign In