Contact Us
Sign In

Amazon Polly vs. Play.ht

The best way to compare Amazon Polly vs. Play.ht: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

Get Started for Free

Live Demo

Try our text-to-speech API. Click a button to generate random text:

Non-Fiction
Fiction
News
Blog
Conversation
0/250
Filesize
0 kb
Text to speech API - Amazon Polly

Amazon Polly

Text-to-speech service to transform text into natural-sounding speech using deep learning technologies.
Text to speech API - Play.ht

Play.ht

Transform written content into high-quality, lifelike voiceovers with AI-powered text-to-speech technology.

Voice Quality

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
3.00
Non-Fiction
2.51
Conversation
2.63
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
4.17
Non-Fiction
4.17
Conversation
3.48
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.
  • Based on the Mean Opinion Scores provided, Play.ht generally offers higher voice quality across fiction, non-fiction, and conversation categories compared to Amazon Polly.
  • Play.ht's scores in fiction and non-fiction are particularly notable, indicating a more lifelike and engaging listening experience.
  • This suggests that for users prioritizing voice quality, Play.ht might be the preferable choice.

Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
  • Amazon Polly and Play.ht both offer multi-lingual support, per-word timestamps, speed control, and support for phone formats, highlighting their versatility in text-to-speech applications.
  • However, Play.ht distinguishes itself with voice cloning capabilities, a feature not available in Amazon Polly, potentially offering a more personalized audio experience.
  • Conversely, Amazon Polly provides pitch control, an option not found in Play.ht, allowing for more nuanced voice customization.

Pricing & Plans

Free
$0/mo
1M characters (for first 12 months only)
Pay As You Go
$16per
1M characters
Free
$0/mo
12,500 characters
Creator
$39/mo
250,000 characters
Unlimited
$99/mo
2.5M characters limit
  • For users seeking the most cost-effective text-to-speech service, Amazon Polly offers the best value across the board, with a particularly appealing free plan for the first year and a competitive Pay As You Go rate for moderate usage.
  • Play.ht's Unlimited plan may attract users with very high usage needs despite its higher cost, but Amazon Polly remains the more economical choice for most users.
  • Overall, Amazon Polly stands out for its affordability, especially for those prioritizing cost over specific features.

Customer Reviews

4.4 out of 5
Average of 68 ratings from leading review sites.
Customers appreciate Amazon Polly for its natural-sounding voices, ease of use, and integration with AWS services. They find it beneficial for various applications like IVR systems, content creation, and multilingual support. However, concerns about cost, limited customization options, and occasional unnatural inflections in the voices are common. The service's scalability and fast response times are highlighted as significant advantages, helping businesses efficiently manage large-scale projects.
Ease of use
Natural-sounding voices
Integration with AWS
Scalability
Voice inflection
Cost
Customization options
4.6 out of 5
Average of 293 ratings from leading review sites.
Play.ht is highly praised for its diverse and realistic voice options, ease of use, and excellent customer support. Users appreciate the ability to create audio content efficiently, especially for multilingual and varied voice needs. However, some users note issues with natural inflection, especially with complex terms, and express concerns about the pricing structure and occasional technical glitches. The platform's continuous updates and addition of new features are well-received, though some desire more control over voice modulation and better integration with certain plugins.
Voice diversity
Ease of use
Customer support
Pricing
Natural inflection
Technical reliability

Summary

  • In comparing Amazon Polly and Play.ht for text-to-speech services, Play.ht emerges as the superior option in terms of voice quality, offering more lifelike and engaging voiceovers across various content types.
  • However, Amazon Polly presents a more cost-effective solution with its competitive pricing and a generous free plan, making it an attractive choice for users with budget constraints.
  • Feature-wise, both services cater to a broad range of needs, but Play.ht's unique voice cloning capability may offer additional value for those seeking personalized audio experiences.

Looking for a better alternative to Amazon Polly & Play.ht?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free
Sign In