Affordable, high-quality AI Text-to-Speech (TTS) voice generation.
Voice Quality
Murf API Samples
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Neets.ai Samples
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems.
The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality.
These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.
Features
Murf API Features
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Neets.ai Features
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Features - Conclusion
Murf API offers a more feature-rich text-to-speech service, including voice cloning, pitch control, and support for multiple languages, catering to a wider range of customization and application needs.
In contrast, Neets.ai, while offering multi-lingual support and speed control, lacks voice cloning and pitch control, positioning it as a more basic but highly affordable option.
Both services support phone formats and speed control, indicating a focus on versatility and user control, but Murf API's broader feature set aligns with its higher pricing, targeting professional or enterprise-level users seeking advanced capabilities.
Pricing & Plans
Murf API Pricing
API Subscription
$3000/year
12M characters (per year)
Neets.ai Pricing
Free
$0/mo
25,000 characters
Pro
$6/mo
100,000 characters
Extra: $5 per 1M chars
Pricing & Plans - Conclusion
Neets.ai emerges as the more cost-effective choice for both low and high usage scenarios, offering a free plan for minimal needs and highly affordable rates for increased usage, including an exceptionally low rate for extra characters beyond its Pro Plan.
In contrast, Murf API presents a single annual plan that, while potentially suitable for specific needs, generally falls behind Neets.ai in terms of affordability.
Overall, users seeking value across a range of usage levels will find Neets.ai to offer better financial terms.
In comparing Murf API and Neets.ai for text-to-speech services, Murf API stands out with its advanced features such as voice cloning and pitch control, catering to users requiring high customization and professional use, albeit at a higher cost.
Neets.ai, on the other hand, offers a more affordable solution with basic features suitable for users with minimal needs or those on a tight budget.
Overall, while Murf API targets a professional audience with its comprehensive feature set and higher price point, Neets.ai appeals to cost-conscious users seeking essential text-to-speech functionalities.
Looking for a better alternative to Murf API & Neets.ai?
Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.
Murf API Samples
Neets.ai Samples
