Contact Us
Sign In

Microsoft Azure AI Speech vs. Play.ht

The best way to compare Microsoft Azure AI Speech vs. Play.ht: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

Get Started for Free

Live Demo

Try our text-to-speech API. Click a button to generate random text:

Non-Fiction
Fiction
News
Blog
Conversation
0/250
Filesize
0 kb
Text to speech API - Microsoft Azure AI Speech

Microsoft Azure AI Speech

Enables your applications, tools, or devices to convert text into human-like synthesized speech.
Text to speech API - Play.ht

Play.ht

Transform written content into high-quality, lifelike voiceovers with AI-powered text-to-speech technology.

Voice Quality

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
3.69
Non-Fiction
3.13
Conversation
3.18
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
4.17
Non-Fiction
4.17
Conversation
3.48
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.
  • Based on the Mean Opinion Scores provided, Play.ht generally offers higher voice quality across fiction, non-fiction, and conversation categories compared to Microsoft Azure AI Speech.
  • Play.ht achieves particularly notable superiority in fiction and non-fiction voice quality.
  • This suggests that users prioritizing natural-sounding voiceovers might find Play.ht more appealing for these specific types of content.

Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
  • Both Microsoft Azure AI Speech and Play.ht offer a comprehensive set of features for text-to-speech conversion, including voice cloning, multi-lingual support, per-word timestamps, and support for phone formats.
  • However, Microsoft Azure AI Speech distinguishes itself with additional pitch control, which is not available in Play.ht.
  • Conversely, both platforms support speed control, showcasing their versatility in adjusting the playback of synthesized speech to meet user preferences.

Pricing & Plans

Free
$0/mo
5 hours of audio (~225K chars)
Pay As You Go
$15per
1M characters
Free
$0/mo
12,500 characters
Creator
$39/mo
250,000 characters
Unlimited
$99/mo
2.5M characters limit
  • In a comparison of text-to-speech services based solely on pricing, Microsoft Azure AI Speech emerges as the more cost-effective option across all usage levels, from low to high.
  • It offers a larger free tier and maintains a lower cost for both moderate and high usage scenarios.
  • Play.ht, while competitive, especially with its Unlimited plan for high volume users, still does not match the affordability of Microsoft Azure AI Speech.

Summary

  • In comparing Microsoft Azure AI Speech and Play.ht for text-to-speech services, Play.ht stands out for its superior voice quality across various content types, making it a preferable choice for users seeking more natural-sounding voiceovers.
  • However, Microsoft Azure AI Speech offers a more cost-effective solution with a broader range of features, including pitch control, which Play.ht lacks.
  • Ultimately, the choice between the two services hinges on the user's priorities: voice quality and specific features versus overall cost and a wider array of functionalities.

Looking for a better alternative to Microsoft Azure AI Speech & Play.ht?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free
Sign In