API Docs Pricing Studio Blog
Contact Us
Sign In

IBM Watson vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech

The best way to compare IBM Watson vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

Get Started for Free →

Live Demo

Try our text-to-speech API. Click a button to generate random text:

Non-Fiction
Fiction
News
Blog
Conversation
0/250
Voice
Format
Normal
Speed
Filesize
0 kb
Text to speech API - IBM Watson

IBM Watson

Convert text into natural-sounding speech in a variety of languages and voices.
Text to speech API - Google Cloud Text-to-Speech

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech

Allows developers to create natural-sounding, synthetic human speech as playable audio.

Voice Quality

IBM Watson Samples

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Samples

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
3.93
Non-Fiction
3.82
Conversation
3.42
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.

Features

IBM Watson Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Features - Conclusion

  • Both IBM Watson and Google Cloud Text-to-Speech offer a range of features that cater to creating natural-sounding, synthetic speech, including voice cloning, multi-lingual support, pitch and speed control, and support for phone formats.
  • However, IBM Watson distinguishes itself with the addition of per-word timestamps, which could be crucial for applications requiring precise synchronization between text and speech.
  • On the other hand, Google Cloud Text-to-Speech does not support per-word timestamps, which might limit its utility in certain specialized applications.

Pricing & Plans

IBM Watson Pricing

Free
$0/mo
10,000 characters
Standard
$20per
1M characters

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Pricing

Free
$0/mo
1M characters
Pay As You Go
$16per
1M characters

Pricing & Plans - Conclusion

  • In terms of pricing, Google Cloud Text-to-Speech emerges as the more cost-effective option for both free and paid plans compared to IBM Watson.
  • Google Cloud's free tier offers significantly more value by providing a larger volume of characters at no cost.
  • Additionally, its paid plan is more affordable, making it an attractive choice for users looking for an economical text-to-speech service.

Customer Reviews

IBM Watson Reviews

4.1 out of 5
Average of 44 ratings from leading review sites.
Customers appreciate IBM Watson Text to Speech for its ease of integration, speed, and support for multiple languages, making it versatile for various applications like education, customer service, and accessibility for the disabled. The ability to customize voice and tone is highly valued. However, some users note issues with pronunciation accuracy, limited language options, and occasional software glitches. The pricing is also considered high for small businesses or individual users.
Ease of integration
Speed
Language support
Customization
Pronunciation accuracy
Software reliability
Pricing
Language diversity

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Reviews

4.6 out of 5
Average of 163 ratings from leading review sites.
Customers appreciate Google Cloud Text-to-Speech for its multilingual support, high-quality voices, and ease of integration. It is praised for its ability to handle various languages and accents, making it versatile for different applications. However, users are dissatisfied with its dependency on internet connectivity and find the pricing structure confusing and potentially costly. The lack of offline functionality is a significant drawback for many. Despite these issues, the service is valued for its accessibility features and seamless integration with other Google services.
Multilingual support
Voice quality
Ease of integration
Internet dependency
Pricing transparency
Offline functionality

Compare Alternatives

IBM Watson Alternatives

IBM Watson vs. Unreal Speech
IBM Watson vs. Amazon Polly
IBM Watson vs. ElevenLabs
IBM Watson vs. Play.ht
IBM Watson vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech
IBM Watson vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech
IBM Watson vs. Murf API
IBM Watson vs. Neets.ai
IBM Watson vs. Resemble.AI
IBM Watson vs. LOVO AI
IBM Watson vs. Deepgram Aura

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Alternatives

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Unreal Speech
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Amazon Polly
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. ElevenLabs
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Play.ht
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Murf API
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Neets.ai
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Resemble.AI
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. LOVO AI
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs. Deepgram Aura

Summary

  • When comparing IBM Watson and Google Cloud Text-to-Speech, Google Cloud offers a more cost-effective solution with its generous free tier and lower-priced paid plan, making it an attractive option for users prioritizing budget.
  • However, IBM Watson provides unique features such as per-word timestamps, potentially making it the better choice for applications needing precise text-to-speech synchronization.
  • Overall, while Google Cloud leads in affordability and has competitive voice quality scores, IBM Watson's specialized features may justify its higher cost for certain users.

Looking for a better alternative to IBM Watson & Google Cloud Text-to-Speech?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free →
Made with ❤️ in SF
Founder
API Docs Pricing Studio Contact Blog Compare Browse AI Apps Affiliate

Recent Posts

Integrating FastSpeech 2 for Text-to-Speech Synthesis with Fairseq and Hugging Face Exploring the Potential of GPT-SoVITS-Fork for Text-to-Speech Applications Exploring the GPT-SoVITS Kancolle Zuikaku TTS Model: A Comprehensive Guide Exploring Voice Synthesis with ESPnet: A Deep Dive into the kan-bayashi_csmsc_fastspeech Model Introducing OpenVoice: Revolutionizing Text-to-Speech with Instant Voice Cloning and Multilingual Capabilities How to Leverage Twelve Labs API for Effortless YouTube Video Summaries, Chapters, and Highlights
Sign In