API Docs Pricing Studio Blog
Contact Us
Sign In

Resemble.AI vs. Play.ht

The best way to compare Resemble.AI vs. Play.ht: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

Get Started for Free →

Live Demo

Try our text-to-speech API. Click a button to generate random text:

Non-Fiction
Fiction
News
Blog
Conversation
0/250
Voice
Format
Normal
Speed
Filesize
0 kb
Text to speech API - Resemble.AI

Resemble.AI

AI voice generator with voice cloning for text to speech.
Text to speech API - Play.ht

Play.ht

Transform written content into high-quality, lifelike voiceovers with AI-powered text-to-speech technology.

Voice Quality

Resemble.AI Samples

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A

Play.ht Samples

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
4.17
Non-Fiction
4.17
Conversation
3.48
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.

Features

Resemble.AI Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Play.ht Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Features - Conclusion

  • Both Resemble.AI and Play.ht offer advanced text-to-speech services with features like voice cloning and multi-lingual support, catering to a wide range of needs.
  • However, Play.ht distinguishes itself with additional functionalities such as speed control and support for phone formats, which Resemble.AI lacks.
  • Furthermore, Play.ht's provision of per-word timestamps, a feature also found in Resemble.AI, alongside its unique offerings, positions it as a more versatile option for users seeking comprehensive control over their text-to-speech outputs.

Pricing & Plans

Resemble.AI Pricing

Basic
$0.006/second
Pay as you go
~$480 per 1M characters
Pro
$99/mo
80,000 seconds (~1M chars)
Extra: $0.002 per second

Play.ht Pricing

Free
$0/mo
12,500 characters
Creator
$39/mo
250,000 characters
Unlimited
$99/mo
2.5M characters limit

Pricing & Plans - Conclusion

  • In a comparison of text-to-speech services based on pricing, Play.ht emerges as the most cost-effective option for users with high volume needs, offering the best value at $39.6 per million characters with its Unlimited Plan.
  • For those with moderate usage, Resemble.AI's Pro Plan is attractive at $99 per million characters, especially when considering extra usage costs which are significantly lower.
  • Overall, while Resemble.AI's Basic Plan is the priciest, both services offer competitive rates tailored to different user needs, making Play.ht ideal for heavy users and Resemble.AI's Pro Plan favorable for moderate use cases.

Customer Reviews

Resemble.AI Reviews

3.6 out of 5
Average of 12 ratings from leading review sites.
Customers appreciate Resemble.AI for its time-saving capabilities, voice cloning accuracy, and the ability to add emotions and tones to AI-generated speech. It is particularly valued for content creation and localization features. However, criticisms include its pay-as-you-go pricing model, limited language options without premium plans, and occasional technical glitches like voice pitch issues and electronic noises. Some users also find the user interface could be improved and the AI voices need to sound more natural.
Time-saving
Voice cloning accuracy
Content creation
Localization
User interface
Naturalness of AI voices
Pricing model
Language options
Technical performance

Play.ht Reviews

4.6 out of 5
Average of 293 ratings from leading review sites.
Play.ht is highly praised for its diverse and realistic voice options, ease of use, and excellent customer support. Users appreciate the ability to create audio content efficiently, especially for multilingual and varied voice needs. However, some users note issues with natural inflection, especially with complex terms, and express concerns about the pricing structure and occasional technical glitches. The platform's continuous updates and addition of new features are well-received, though some desire more control over voice modulation and better integration with certain plugins.
Voice diversity
Ease of use
Customer support
Pricing
Natural inflection
Technical reliability

Compare Alternatives

Resemble.AI Alternatives

Resemble.AI vs. Unreal Speech
Resemble.AI vs. Amazon Polly
Resemble.AI vs. ElevenLabs
Resemble.AI vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech
Resemble.AI vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech
Resemble.AI vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech
Resemble.AI vs. Murf API
Resemble.AI vs. Neets.ai
Resemble.AI vs. IBM Watson
Resemble.AI vs. LOVO AI
Resemble.AI vs. Deepgram Aura

Play.ht Alternatives

Play.ht vs. Unreal Speech
Play.ht vs. Amazon Polly
Play.ht vs. ElevenLabs
Play.ht vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech
Play.ht vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech
Play.ht vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech
Play.ht vs. Murf API
Play.ht vs. Neets.ai
Play.ht vs. IBM Watson
Play.ht vs. LOVO AI
Play.ht vs. Deepgram Aura

Summary

  • In comparing Resemble.AI and Play.ht for text-to-speech services, Play.ht stands out for its superior voice quality, more comprehensive feature set including speed control and phone format support, and its cost-effectiveness, particularly for users with high volume needs.
  • Resemble.AI, while pricier, offers competitive features like voice cloning and multi-lingual support, making it a viable option for moderate usage scenarios.
  • Overall, Play.ht offers the best value and versatility for a wide range of text-to-speech applications, from voiceovers to conversational AI.

Looking for a better alternative to Resemble.AI & Play.ht?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free →
Made with ❤️ in SF
Founder
API Docs Pricing Studio Contact Blog Compare Browse AI Apps Affiliate

Recent Posts

Integrating FastSpeech 2 for Text-to-Speech Synthesis with Fairseq and Hugging Face Exploring the Potential of GPT-SoVITS-Fork for Text-to-Speech Applications Exploring the GPT-SoVITS Kancolle Zuikaku TTS Model: A Comprehensive Guide Exploring Voice Synthesis with ESPnet: A Deep Dive into the kan-bayashi_csmsc_fastspeech Model Introducing OpenVoice: Revolutionizing Text-to-Speech with Instant Voice Cloning and Multilingual Capabilities How to Leverage Twelve Labs API for Effortless YouTube Video Summaries, Chapters, and Highlights
Sign In