Transform written content into high-quality, lifelike voiceovers with AI-powered text-to-speech technology.
Voice Quality
Deepgram Aura Samples
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Play.ht Samples
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
4.17
Non-Fiction
4.17
Conversation
3.48
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems.
The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality.
These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.
Features
Deepgram Aura Features
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Play.ht Features
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Features - Conclusion
In comparing the features of Deepgram Aura and Play.ht, it's evident that Play.ht offers a more feature-rich text-to-speech service.
Play.ht supports voice cloning, is multi-lingual, provides per-word timestamps, and allows for speed control, making it versatile for various applications.
In contrast, Deepgram Aura's feature set is more limited, lacking in voice cloning, multi-lingual support, per-word timestamps, pitch control, and speed control, though it does support phone formats.
Pricing & Plans
Deepgram Aura Pricing
Pay As You Go
$15per
1M characters
Growth
$4k-10k/year
Pre-paid credits for entire year
Cost: $13.50 per 1M chars
Play.ht Pricing
Free
$0/mo
12,500 characters
Creator
$39/mo
250,000 characters
Unlimited
$99/mo
2.5M characters limit
Pricing & Plans - Conclusion
Deepgram Aura offers a cost-effective Pay As You Go plan for users with lower text-to-speech needs, making it an attractive option for those on a tight budget or with sporadic usage patterns.
Play.ht, on the other hand, shines for users with consistent high-volume needs, especially with its Unlimited plan that caters well to those requiring extensive character usage monthly.
For high-volume users, Deepgram Aura's Growth plan could potentially offer value, but without specific details on character inclusion, Play.ht's transparent and flexible monthly plans present a clearer advantage for varied user requirements.
In summary, Play.ht emerges as the more versatile and feature-rich text-to-speech service, offering higher voice quality scores, a broader range of features including voice cloning and multi-lingual support, and flexible pricing plans suited for both low and high-volume users.
Deepgram Aura, while more limited in features and voice quality evaluation, presents a cost-effective Pay As You Go option for users with sporadic or low text-to-speech needs.
Overall, Play.ht stands out for users seeking comprehensive text-to-speech capabilities, whereas Deepgram Aura may appeal to those prioritizing budget over breadth of features.
Looking for a better alternative to Deepgram Aura & Play.ht?
Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.