Allows developers to create natural-sounding, synthetic human speech as playable audio.
Voice Quality
Deepgram Aura Samples
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Samples
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
3.93
Non-Fiction
3.82
Conversation
3.42
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems.
The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality.
These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.
Features
Deepgram Aura Features
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Features
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Features - Conclusion
In comparing the features of Deepgram Aura and Google Cloud Text-to-Speech, it's evident that Google Cloud offers a more feature-rich service.
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech supports voice cloning, is multi-lingual, and allows for pitch and speed control, features that Deepgram Aura lacks.
This makes Google Cloud Text-to-Speech a more versatile and customizable option for developers looking to integrate text-to-speech capabilities into their applications.
Pricing & Plans
Deepgram Aura Pricing
Pay As You Go
$15per
1M characters
Growth
$4k-10k/year
Pre-paid credits for entire year
Cost: $13.50 per 1M chars
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech Pricing
Free
$0/mo
1M characters
Pay As You Go
$16per
1M characters
Pricing & Plans - Conclusion
For users with low monthly text-to-speech needs, Google Cloud Text-to-Speech stands out with its free tier for up to 1M characters.
Deepgram Aura offers a slightly more affordable Pay As You Go option for moderate usage compared to Google Cloud's equivalent plan.
For high-volume users, Deepgram Aura's Growth plan potentially provides significant savings, though it requires a considerable upfront investment.
When comparing Deepgram Aura and Google Cloud Text-to-Speech, Google Cloud emerges as the more versatile and feature-rich option, offering voice cloning, multi-lingual support, and controls for pitch and speed, which Deepgram Aura lacks.
In terms of pricing, Google Cloud provides a free tier suitable for low usage, while Deepgram Aura's Growth plan may offer better value for high-volume users despite its higher upfront cost.
Overall, Google Cloud Text-to-Speech stands out for its comprehensive features, making it potentially a more attractive choice for developers seeking to integrate advanced text-to-speech capabilities into their applications.
Looking for a better alternative to Deepgram Aura & Google Cloud Text-to-Speech?
Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.