Deploy high quality voices for your apps, website and other services at scale.
Voice Quality
Deepgram Aura Samples
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Murf API Samples
Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems.
The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality.
These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.
Features
Deepgram Aura Features
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Murf API Features
Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)
Features - Conclusion
Comparing the features of Deepgram Aura and Murf API, it's evident that Murf API offers a more versatile and feature-rich service.
Murf API supports voice cloning, is multi-lingual, and allows for pitch and speed control, making it suitable for a wider range of applications.
In contrast, Deepgram Aura's feature set is more limited, lacking in voice cloning, multi-lingual support, and controls for pitch and speed, though it does support phone formats.
Pricing & Plans
Deepgram Aura Pricing
Pay As You Go
$15per
1M characters
Growth
$4k-10k/year
Pre-paid credits for entire year
Cost: $13.50 per 1M chars
Murf API Pricing
API Subscription
$3000/year
12M characters (per year)
Pricing & Plans - Conclusion
Deepgram Aura offers two pricing plans, with the Growth Plan providing the best value for users who require a large volume of text-to-speech conversion and are willing to make an upfront payment.
Murf API, on the other hand, presents a higher annual cost for its API Subscription, making it a pricier option compared to Deepgram Aura's offerings.
Overall, for users focused solely on pricing and volume, Deepgram Aura's Growth Plan emerges as the most cost-effective choice.
When comparing Deepgram Aura and Murf API for text-to-speech services, Murf API stands out with its richer feature set, including voice cloning, multi-lingual support, and pitch and speed control, catering to a broader range of applications.
However, Deepgram Aura offers a more cost-effective solution, especially with its Growth Plan for users needing high volumes of text-to-speech conversion.
Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on the specific needs and budget constraints of the user, with Murf API being the go-to for feature richness and Deepgram Aura for those prioritizing affordability.
Looking for a better alternative to Deepgram Aura & Murf API?
Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.